The HTML checker itself has been refined. In particular it treats quotes more sensibly (which should please Nik at least).
Oh - there's an experimental text-only theme which should kick in automatically if you use Netscape 4.7x, Lynx or Links (not been able to test Netscape). Those watching in colour can see it in action by clicking here. A nifty feature is that inline images are turned into clicky links. One day there'll be a proper link to this, and I'm hoping it might eventually form the basis of a version for mobile devices.
*has more features in pipeline, but only two days before school*
Seriously, though, (and this is probably not much help) the US company Tuff Shed manufacturers a bewildering variety of sheds (which they call "storage buildings"). Some very silly styles, though... 10'x30 loafing shed, anyone?
Who do I follow that?
I can't keep up!
Meanwhile a celebration game might be appropriate. Any ideas? Maybe a verse game??
Don't upgrade your code, kids!
*****crescendo drum roll, circling spotlights*****
The other sensational news for D class celeb watchers is the return od I'm a Celebrity Get me Out of Here. The line up being
John Lydon
Neil Ruddock
Alex Best
Kerry McFadden
Jordan
Mike Read
Lord Brocket
Peter Andre
Jenny Bond
Diane Modahl
I will admit even at this early stage, that my shares will be on my adolescent hero from the Sex Pistols, to become King of the Jungle.
It's a ridiculous cliché to say that British telly is the best in the world, but there's also some truth in it. Try watching US telly sometime - yes, there are good programmes on (after all, many of them are shown on British telly too) but the amount of utter irredeemable tripe is enormous and far outweighs the good stuff (at least on terrestrial). One very good reason that there is no licence fee in the States is that nothing being put out on the terrestrial networks is worth it.
We have a TV in order to watch Star Trek. That's about it.
Mind you, the Verse game has not really caught on... so its replacement with, erm, something would probably be A Good Thing.
Forget I mentioned that.
Meanwhile over at Daq Towers, the hamsters have been busy, I had been expecting x_sugarbabe_x, at the top, but keeping it in the family its Chalky as No1 over at Celebtity Mornington Crescent, and will DrQu+xum be ready to take over next week?
I thought Googolgoat was a good alterative moniker (as seen on MCiOS), which keeps the essence of the name while avoiding initials. Oh well, I'll shut up now.
*sympathy hugs* for flerdle, rab and Bob [whose simulpost I've just seen]
[rab] a 'specialised' meeting ??
Unfortunately when we moved offices we lost free pop privileges, and the coffee here is worse. Hmmph.
[Rosie] It was probably Tetleys he was drinking.
[All] I may well not be in the chatroom on Monday due to a visitation from my brother; on the other hand, it may not last alnight so I could make a late entry into the charts.
A return to the top for ffiish , thanks to this weeks special celebrity I'm Jordan Get Me on the Front Page
If you see what I mean.
OK, I'll just stick a sock in it.
I take it these ways will be a bit ironical, like.
Why do I mention this, you ask? Every so often I'm asked to review papers for academic journals, and until today I've never had cause to recommend a rejection... and for some reason I feel rather bad about doing so. But then, we can't be accused of falling standards now, can we?
If you mean "Putting game moves in bold" then the answer is "to make an actual move stand out from any by play and commentary". That's about the only interpretation I can place on your query, but I'm still confused to be honest.
... and [Bob] Is the ISIHaC weekend in May still a runner?