arrow_circle_left arrow_circle_up arrow_circle_right

AVMA Take 2

help

Yes, it's another round of that classic guessing game - Animal, Vegetable, Mineral, Abstract [or any combination thereof]. This effort - '03/'04 should address any queries, but then again, may just serve to confuse and baffle which some might say is the point of the game. Patience, integrity and a decent search engine may be useful ....

arrow_circle_up

The Black Plague?

(I seem to have mashed up "Black Death" and "bubonic plague." Abomination!)

The death penalty?

[Quendalon] Bubonic Death? - NO
[CdM] Judicial killing? - NO
(Remember - associated with a specific location) - let me re-answer Tuj's earlier question - the association is not a specific country, but is in a specific country. Also, I should probably have answered Phil's question about Politics a bit more positively - there is a link, but that's not the essence of the answer.

Is this a mass graveyard?

Is the geographic region (in) North America?

[Chalky] Mass Grave? - NO *a little ripple*
[Quendalon] Norteamericano? - NO

Associated with a specific historical event?

[Quendalon] Specific historical event? - YES *some relieved applause*

Did it take place in Asia?

Did the historical event occur before 1800?

A WW1 Cemetary?

Named after a person?

[Phil] Asian? - YES *more relieved applause*
[Boolbar] pre-1800? - NO
[Chalky] Rows of crosses?- NO
[Quendalon] eponymous? - NO

Did the killings involve firearms?

A shot in the dark.

Getting warm

[Quendalon] Shots in the dark and light? - YES

The My Lai (Pinkville) Massacre?

I was briefly sure that the answer had to be the My Lai massacre because INJ started this AVMA on its 45th anniversary. Then I was convinced that was wrong because of the lack of a P-word. Then googling revealed that My Lai was codenamed "Pinkville", which I hadn't known. So now I am convinced I am right again. :-)

Ha! I was waiting for that.

[CdM] My Lai? - NO but *considerable applause*

The Panjiayu Tragedy?

Going off to look it up

[Phil] Panjiayu? - NO

How about the Pingdingshan one then?

(good old wikipedia)

Let me follow you through wikipedia

[Phil] Pingpong? - NO (IMO it's less obscure - I didn't look it up)

Did this event take place in China?

[Phil] Sinitic? - NO

Phong Nhi and/or Phong Nhat massacres?

Yet more wikipedia for me

[cfm] Phong Not? - NO
(Bonus answer 'Massacre? - NO')

Did the historical event occur before 1920?

Did more than one person perform the actual killing?

[Boolbar] Pre 1920? - NO
[Quendalon] >1 killers? - YES *a few chuckles in the audience*

The 38th Parallel?

[Chalky] Korean? - NO

Was this a key event in a war?

In Asia. Which has been established. I think.

Aha!

[Chalky] Key event in a war? - YES *considerable applause* (and yes, Asia (not China or Korea) has been established)

So .. are we talking Vietnam then?

Which was NOT established by previous line of questioning.

or Japan?

The audience is beginning to pack bags.

[Chalky] Vietnam? - YES
[Phil] Therefore Japan? - NO

Dien Bien Phu?

Has Raak scored a lurker's victory?

The Battle of Dien Bien Phu?

... as you specifically stated earlier that this was not the name of a place.

There, that wasn't so hard, was it?

[Chalky] It is indeed The battle of Dien Bien Phu where a small French force held out for weeks against overwhelming Viet Minh forces before being comprehensively defeated. The French inability to relieve or effectively resupply the garrison spelt the end of French colonial ambitions in Indo-China.
Since I got this round as a bit of a lurker I feel disinclined to step into this quarrel, but the answer is specifically the battle, not the place.

Throws a baton in the air to see who will catch it.

Me!

Thank you NotJohn for a splendid AVMA - spookily not dissimilar to a subject that'd crossed my mind a few weeks ago - should the chair beckon.
So this is not that one, NotJohn - it's this one ..

ABSTRACT

Related to mathematics?

The #1 question on the board.

Begins with P?

Surely #2.
[NJ] And well done for not getting impatient as the team worked at getting there! Bit worried about those black-humoured audience members chuckling near the end...

Pi?

In case the previous two were both correct.

Related to the arts?

Some answers

(Quendalon) Mathematics? - NO only obliquely
(Tuj) P? - YES :)
(Gusset Login) Pi? - NO
(NotJohn) Arts? NO

Is the AOTC just one word?

Science-related?

A human invention?

Good questions

(Phil) One word answer - YES
(NotJohn) Science-related? - NO only obliquely
(Tuj) Human invention? - YES although I'd question the word 'invention'

Perfection?

[Phil] Perfection? NO *audience begins to pay attention*

Does the AOTC describe a state of being or quality?

Would the answer on the card exist in a world without humans?

(No, I don't think this question is rendered moot by Tuj's question...)

Apologies for absence -

(cfm) State of being or quality? - YES
(CdM) Exist in a world without humans? - NO :)

Is the word on the card an adjective?

Clever questioning ...

(Quendo) Adjective? - NO, not in this instance.

Is the word used in reference to animals (as opposed to homo sapiens solely)?

(Dujon) In reference to animals? - NO

Is it normally considered positive?

Is the AOTC a state of mind?

Is the word used in reference to humans?

(NotJohn) Positive? To some YES; to most, I suspect NO.
(cfm) State of mind? YES
(Quendalon) Humans? - still YES

Is the word used in reference to one gender significantly more than the other?

(Quendalon) Gender specific? - NO

any more for any more?

Linked to a particular culture?

Is it a recognised medical condition or syndrome?

Pleasure?

Associated with a particular geographic location?

Does the word on the card start with a prefix?

Pedantry

(CdM) Linked to a particular culture? - Erm ... N0 - well maybe a small 'yes' but am not sure if that's helpful. Am struggling with the culture word to be honest.
(NotJohn) Medical condition/syndrome? - NO
(Software) Pleasure? - NO.
(Tuj) Location location? - NO
(Quendalon) Prefixed word? - NO
(Phil) Pedantry? - NO but *appreciative sounds can be heard in the audience*

Related to religion?

(Quendalon) Religion-related? Could be - but not necessarily.

An attitude?

Related to philosophy?

Related to language?

(Dujon) An attitude? - YES it is. And more. *audience has perked up* .
(Quendalon) Philosophical? - if you scratch the surface, the AOTC might be ascribed to various philosophies - so I'd say more Yes than No. However, this could apply to most attitudes so my answer may not be too helpful.
(NotJohn) Language? - NO

*contemplating an earlier question by Quendalon regarding mathematics - perhaps I should have replied 'Yes, but only obliquely'*

Perfectionism?

(NotJohn) Perfectionism? - NO *audience remains perky*

Does the AOTC end with "ism" ?

Aha!

(Phil) -ism? - NO - although all three letters are contained within but not necessarily in the same order :)

Promise?

Is the word on the card a noun (in this instance)?

.. back in business

(Tuj) Promise? - NO
(Quendalon) A noun? YES indeed it is.

Perfect?

(Software) Perfect? - NO more than when Phil asked the same on 28th March :)

I chose this 'P' word because it has a succinct definition. A human trait, which we have established, which can easily be arrived at given some judicious questioning.
However, this word has another use which necessitates a change to a couple of my replies. Mathematical/Scientific/Philosophical links are rather stronger if this path to the solution is chosen.

... and what's more

... a little research tells me that this alternative use of my P word is the crux of a Subject for guessing in this very game back in 2005.

Related to anger?

Proof?

Is the 'P' silent?

(cfm) Related to anger? - NO
(Gusset Login) Proof? - NO (see my last reply to Phil)
(NotJohn) Silent P? - NO. A noisy one :)

Does the word on the card end with a suffix?

Flailing around in the dark, because frankly I'm stumped.

(Quendalon) Suffix? NO - nor an 'ology' or 'ism'

--- begins with a P and also contains the letters m, s and i within. One word. A human trait which is neither gender nor geographically related. Desirable to some but probably rather annoying for others.
This particular word has another use and is key to a scientific/mathematical/philosophical principle which was the subject for an AVMA in 2005.

Parsimony?

While I try to think of another way in.

Result!

Thank you and well played NotJohn - was hoping for an early solution today as I am in need of rescue ...
For me - Parsimony is frugality or excessive economy which was my starting point all those days ago. As for the secondary meaning - Occam's Razor was the subject of the AVMA (with the principle of parsimony at its technical core).

And I used the word 'rescue' advisedly. My daughter has just gone into early labour and I may needed at the hospital ...
*swiftly hands over baton to NotJohn on way out*

Calling Raak

[Chalky] Hope it all goes well
Yes, the mathematical and philosophical connotations did come to me after I'd thought of the word.
Now maybe I can remedy the unsatisfactory end to the previous game by suggesting that Raak gets his belated turn.

Who, me?

Er, ok then. The next is ABSTRACT with ANIMAL connections.
[Chalky] Best wishes for all three of you.

Is the animal connection human?

Any artistic connection?

[cfm] Human
[NJ] Not artistic.

Is it the act of giving birth?

[Chalky] More best wishes winging their way to you.

Is there more than one word on the card?

[Chalky] Best wishes and congratulations! Remember that "Mornington Crescent" is a lovely name for a girl or a boy.

Is the answer a phrase or saying?

[Chalky, Ms Chalky] All the best!

An intellectual process?
[Chalky] How lovely! Also you look far too young to be a grandmother. :-)]

[B] Topical waaaah!!!? No.
[Q] More than one word.
[Tuj] Not a saying?
[cfm] Not intellectual.

we are not a grandmother .. yet

Thanks for all the good wishes! Bad News - daughter poorly. Good News - 32 wk foetus staying where it is for the time being.)
Sorry to interrupt your game Raak. I have a question .. coming up shortly

More than one human being?

Is it unique?

Is it an event?

[Chalky] More than one.
[Q] Not unique.
[NJ] Not an event.

Fictional?

[Chalky] Not fictional.

A group?

[GL] Not an organised group, although the people associated with this have something in common.

Do any of the words on the card start with 'P'?

[Q] No Ps anywhere.

[Raak] To be clear, is this simply a flamboyant way of saying no to the question that was asked, or are you providing additional information to the effect that the letter 'P' does not appear anywhere on the card?

[Q] The letter P does not occur anywhere on the card.

[Raak] Excellent, thank you!

This thing in common - medical/health connections?

Any political connections?

[Chalky] No medical/health connections.
[NJ] Yes, political connections.

The Iron Lady?

[S] Ding-dong? No.

A recognized voting block that is not formally organized?

Is it associated with a specific geographical area?

[cfm] Not a voting block.
[NJ] Not really. The thing on the card is found in many places.

Anarcho-syndicalism?

[Chalky] (laughter) Absolutely not anarcho-syndicalism.

The humans involved, are they politicians?

[Q] Not politicians.

Is it a political or economic philosophy?

[NJ] Not a philosophy, although it could be said to be connected with one.

A trade agreement?

[GL] Not a trade agreement.

Is there a fiscal or financial connection?

[NJ] *applause from those members of the audience who haven't been holding their breath so long they've expired* To do with money! Yes!

Does each instance of the phrase on the card relate to more than one human?

[Q] Er....no. Each instance involves one human.

A member of the audience

How about playing Hangman for it! Is there a Ⱙ?

(hastily withdrawing his hand from the ventriloquist's dummy) No Ⱙ.

Is there a 'V'?

Hmm. Related to both politics and money. Each instance involves one human, and the people associated with this have something in common. Could be said to be connected with a philosophy.

[Q] No V.

Connected with individual wealth?

[NJ] **applause** Yes! Very much connected with individual wealth!

Income tax?

[CdM] Not income tax.

Connected with an increase in individual wealth?

Shareholder?

Unearned Income?

[GL] *more applause* Yes, an increase in individual wealth.
[S] Not shareholders.
[NJ] *laughter* Legally speaking, it is not classified as unearned income.

Union strike benefits?

[Q] Not strike benefits.

Expenses of some sort?

[NJ] Duck houses? No.

Associated with gambling?

Connected with Banker's Bonuses?

[NJ] Not gambling.
[GL] Not merely connected, but the very words on the card! Have this fat brown envelope.

Oh, um er... right

thanks

ANIMAL and VEGETABLE

Is the animal element human?

Is the vegetable edible?

[NJ] Oh the humanity? (animal) No.
[Chalky] Just eat it? (veg) Yes

Is the AOTC food?

[NJ] Glorious food? Yes, I believe most people would classify it as food.

Marmite?

Associated with a particular culture?

[Quenda] Yeeeach? No
[CdM] regional speciality? I would say, no, but some people disagree.

Savoury - as opposed to sweet?

Is it cooked?

[Chalky] Savoury? Yes
[Quenda] Heated? Yes

Containing multiple distinct (as opposed to mixed or blended) ingredients?

Is the animal part - meat?

[CdM] Clumps o'stuff? Yes
[Chalky] meat? (animal) Yes

Is the AOTC in the form 'A and B'?

As in 'Bangers and Mash'

Is there a liquid component?

Is it a sandwich?

Is it like a proper meal - Sunday Roast or suchlike?

Is the vegetable part potatoes cut into strips and deep fried?

Sorry for the delay, I was at a friend's funeral and couldn't get to the net.
[NJ] A + B? No
[cfm] liquid? There shouldn't be, No.
[Tuj] The Earl of foods? Yes
[Chalky] A meal in itself? No, its a sandwich, see Tuj's question above.
[Raak] Do you want fries with that? No.

A hero/hoagie/submarine sandwich?

A BLT?

[cfm] One of those types? It can be
[Chalky] BLT? Yes. Have a delicious baton.

<mode=ultrapedant>So the bread was made without salt? Yuk.</mode> Sorry, once I thought of it, I couldn't keep it to myself. Sorry again.

Gosh

Thanks GL - that was a swift conclusion - probably due the early airing of the 'edible' question.

Aiming for another quickie with:

MINERAL and VEGETABLE with a pedant-sized trace of ANIMAL

Is it a tool?

[NotJohn] Tool? NO

Something made of wood held together with metal?

[Raak] Wood held with metal? NO

A geographical feature?

Is it a sandwich?

Is the vegetable part potatoes cut into strips and deep fried?

[NotJohn] Geographical feature? YES
[Tuj] Sandwich? NO :)
[Gusset Login] Stripped fried spuds? NO :)

... furthermore - it doesn't begin with P.

Is its name something-or-other forest?

[Rosie - hello:)] Something-or-other forest? NO *audience perks up*

Is its name Mount something-or-other?

[GL] Mount ...? NO

Is it in a single country?

[Chalky] Oh, you answered a question I didn't ask! Perhaps "Is it a sandwich?" should become my default question...

Is it unique?

[GL] Unique? YES

[Tuj] In a single country? YES

In Europe?

[Tuj] Europe? Oh YES indeedy

In the British Isles?

[Rosie] British Isles? YES

Is it on a hill?

Is it a range of hills?

[Raak] ON a hill? There is some undulation but contour lines indicate the AOTC isn't actually ON a hill. *audience applauds the question*
[Rosie] A range of hills? NO

A site of archaeological significance?

... nearly there

{Raak] Archaeological significance? YES! *huge cheer erupts from audience*

A henge?

A stone circle but not technically a henge?

Is it about 2 miles (3.2 km) west of Amesbury and 8 miles (13 km) north of Salisbury?

Stonehenge?

I may be wrong but I'm not proud.

*audience on edge of their seats*

[NotJohn] A Henge? YES!
[Gusset Login] A stone circle/not technically a henge? NO - the AOTC is both
[Raak] NO ... therefore
[Quendalon] NO - not Stonehenge.

Avebury Stone Circle?

The Ring of Brodgar?

It's a win!

[NotJohn] Brodgar? Not in Scotland .. staying with my county of residence - Wiltshire - and
Phil scores a stunning lurker's victory with the correct [more-or-less] AOTC - Avebury Ring.
*gently passes neolithic baton to Phil*

,

Apols for the lurk, but every time I thought of a question, someone else had asked it. I'll make this one quick (I hope).

Mineral

Metal?

A good start...

[NJ] Metal? YES

Iron?

[GL] Iron? YES or NO, depending on the specific meaning of the question.

A manufactured item?

Stainless steel?

Unique?

But is it art?

An iron--like the kind with which one presses one's shirts?

Smaller than a telephone kiosk?

A bridge?

[NJ] Manufactured? YES
[Raak] Stainless Steel? YES, that's what it's made of *a ripple of applause*
[Quendalon] Unique? NO
[Tuj] Art? NO
[cfm] An iron? NO
[Chalky] < phone box? YES
[GL] Bridge? NO

Medical connections?

Is it smaller than a breadbox / bread bin?

Inverting the classic question.

[Raak] Medical? NO (well, a small connection, but it won't help)
[Quendalon] Smaller than breadbox? YES

Does it have any moving parts?

[NJ] Moving parts? YES

Is there one in your kitchen?

[Tuj] In my kitchen? NO. Well, there might be, but I'd move it if I were tidying up.

A tool?

[NJ] Tool? YES

Calipers?

[Software] Calipers? NO *Most of audience look slightly bemused by the handful that clapped, briefly*

A Leatherman?

(On the grounds that a Swiss Army Knife has plastic as well)

A hole punch?

[NJ] Leatherman? NO *some audience members explain to others what a Leatherman is, after which some of them make appreciative noises*
[Raak] Hole punch? NO

Does it cut?

[cfm] A cutter? YES *Applause*

A tin-opener?

Garden shears?

A kitchen tool?

End game appears to have commenced

[Rosie] Tin opener? NO (I wouldn't move that out of the kitchen when tidying)
[Raak] Garden Shears? NO (I'd call them bigger than a breadbin) *appreciative applause*
[NJ] A kitchen tool? NO (again, I'd keep that in the kitchen).

Secateurs?

[Software] Secateurs? NO *more applause*

Scissors?

D'oh - I meant to ask 'garden', for that reason and then turned the question round without thinking.

Wire cutters?

[NJ] Scissors? YES, but more detail required. *Lots of applause*
[Raak] Wire cutters? NO, see above.

Pinking shears?

Nail clippers?

[Quendalon] Pinkers? NO *some applause*
[Raak] Nail clippers? NO *Thunderous applause, oohs, aaahs, gasps and winces*

Nail scissors?

Hair scissors?

[Raak] Nail scissors? YES INDEED! *Deafening roars*
Congrats! Here, have this toenail as a makeshift baton.

VEGETABLE, with ABSTRACT connections.

An object made from vegetable matter?

[Rosie] Yes, made from vegetable matter.

Is wood involved?

Is it edible?

Unique?

Is it smaller than a toaster?

[GL] Would be wood.
[NotJohn] Edible wood? No.
[Tuj] Not unique.
[Phil] Bigger than a toaster.

Is it bigger than a cross-channel ferry?

[GL] Smaller than a cross-channel ferry.

Found domestically?

Does it have writing on it?

Naturally occurring?

[S] Domestic? Not really, at least nowadays.
[Q] Probably not written on.
[T] Not naturally occurring.

A piece of furniture?

Would one find it in a pub?

[R] Not furniture.
[C] *a ripple of applause* Yes, one might find it in a pub.

Does it have a picture or pictures on it?

Is it a container of some sort?

Is it used for a leisure activity?

[Q] No picture.
[NJ] *applause* A container.
[P] A witty thought goes up on the laser display board. Laughter in the audience. Not used for a leisure activity.

Normally holds liquid?

[NJ] Can normally hold liquid.

A barrel?

Might be my turn in it, innit?

[Rosie] *cheering* A barrel is involved. I suggest the abstract connection would repay attention.

Is it a well-known phrase or saying .. like Roll Out The Barrel?

[Chalky] Yes! A well known phrase or saying.

"Over a barrel"?

[Q] Not over a barrel.

So it's a colloquial phrase along the lines of "a can of worms"?

Scraping the barrel?

Barrel of laughs?

[D] Yes.
[R] *oooooh!!* Not quite.
[Q] Not a barrel of laughs.

The bottom of the barrel?

Attempted lurker victories R us

[CdM] Yes! Rosie was nearly there, but you have nailed the exact answer! Have this recycled wooden planter. Ignore the rotten apple juice seeping out of it. And it can now be revealed that the Witty Comment on the laser display board was about the undemanding leisure activity of shooting fish in one.

hmmm ...

.. thought it might be that - was rather hoping that Rosie might get a turn 'in the chair'.
May I respectfully suggest a slight change to the non-rules of this game, ie. you need to have asked at least one question before guessing the AOTC? Or is that altogether too regimentatious? < made up word alert >

I am more than happy for Rosie to take the chair if he wishes. He definitely got 98.2 percent of the way to the AOTC. Mind you, I think this game has had its share of lurker victories, and I'm not exactly a lurker in the grand scheme of things. :-)

Is flattered

(Chalky, CdM) Generous, but let's play by the rules. In any case, if a lurker wins, their "punishment" will be to host the next one. That'll teach 'em not to just jump in and out.

(CdM) Couldn't you have made it 98.4 - body temperature, the percentage of H₂SO₄ in conc. sulphuric, the number of feet in 30 metres . . . . I could go on.

While you're all being polite, I'll get the first question in: Would you find it in your kitchen?

Is it a sandwich?

Anarcho-syndicalism?

Convectively Available Potential Energy (CAPE)?

Where's CdM? Give us a category, man.

This is ANIMAL and VEGETABLE with a trace of MINERAL. I had decided on this before I saw any of your questions, so I am going to go with it. Oh god, I hope Rosie has heard of it :-)

In your kitchen? You could, but it's probably unlikely. I'm pretty sure I have never had one in my kitchen.
A sandwich? Yes! *applause*
Anarchosyndicalism? No.
CAPE? No.

Is egg an ingredient?

Explicitly not counting any egg(s) that are part of the bread-baking process.

A horseburger in a bun?

Eggy? Interesting question. Not necessarily, and not in its own right. But there are versions of this that would include egg as an ingredient, I think.
Shergarburger? No.

Unique?

[Chalky] You have taken the very wind from my sails!

Unique? No. (A unique sandwich??)

Edible?

That Masked Man

Is saurkraut involved?

Contains fish?

A Croque Monsieur?

Edible? I certainly hope so. It's a sandwich!
Sauerkrauty? It's possible (I can find examples online), but it is certainly not an essential or even a standard ingredient.
Fishy? It sometimes contains fish, yes, but need not. For free, I will tell you that it is quite common for it to contain other seafood, however.
Croque monsieur? Non, madame.
Clarification on the egg: my reply was meant to imply that it would be very unusual to see egg listed explicitly as an ingredient, and I stand by that. But googling reveals that it is not unheard of.

A po' boy?

Chip butty with mayo?

could have been a knuckle sandwich :o)

Served hot?

Smörgåsbord?

Slicing to the chase

A po'boy? Yes! (It was the only sandwich beginning with P that came to mind.) Have this foot-long baton stuffed with fried oysters. [Software] Touché, even if I'm not sure what the vegetable component of a knuckle sandwich would be. :-)

Never heard of it ;-)

Yes, well...

[Chalky] I'd bet big money that the number of people who have heard of a po'boy is at least an order of magnitude larger than the number who have heard of the Avebury Stone Circle. :-)

Ah .. but

.. we'll never find out so you may as well bet your big money on the 4.45 at Redcar :-)
For the record - yet another Lurker Victory ...

[CdM] But which is Rosie more likely to know? ;)

[Chalky] I wasn't lurking! It was just my first question of the round. And your first question plus the mention of fish made it easy. :-)
However, I am glad to hand this yummy but calorie-laden baton to someone who would like a turn. Speak up if you'd like to give it a whirl.

[Tuj] Hehe!
[cfm] Only teasing ... as you well know ;-) My mind's eye is seeing badly disguised AVMA players in the shadowy fringes of the game poised to pounce on the AOTC and it's given me an idea for a very silly game along the lines of Spot the Ostrich.
By the way, I shall decline a turn/whirl as I'm a bit too busy this coming week.

[cfm] I'm always glad to take a turn with the baton, assuming that no better candidate presents themselves.

Take it away, Q. :-)

Very well then! This one is unequivocally Vegetable.

Unique?

Well stepped into the breach, that Quenders!
[Chalky] A game idea! Sounds good!

[Tuj] Not unique. *laughter from the crowd*

Peas in a pod?

Is it a sandwich?

leaping in so if i win will not be a lurking victory :)

It is some species of wood?

Victory goes to the swift

The word on the card is "pea," for which Raak's guess is more than sufficiently accurate. Passing a small, round green baton...

Drawing the line

Wow! Ok, the next is ANIMAL.

Human?

I chose it largely so that I could giggle inanely if Tuj asked if it began with the letter 'P'.

Is it unique?

[Q] Human.
[GL] In a sense, it is unique. But one could quibble interminably about it.

Male?

[Q] Apologies for letting you down! I do worry my poor history of questioning has skewed the game somewhat...

Currently alive?

[Quendalon] For your giggling motive alone, you're my hero!

[Q] OOPS! I meant to say "Not human".
[Tuj] Male.
[Phil] Quite likely to be currently alive.

Quadruped?

Is it unique by virtue of something it has done?

[S] Not a quadruped. [NJ] *applause* It is indeed unique by virtue of something it has done.

Is the thing that he has done a physical (versus an abstract) act?

Is this bloke animal larger than the average domestic toaster?

[cfm] A physical act.
[Chalky] Smaller than a toaster.

Is it a bird?

[Phil] Is it a plane? Is it Superman? No, it's a bird!

Cock Robin?

.. avoiding the lurker label

Nah - that was a daft question. It's still alive, you say? And 'sort of' unique?

[Chalky] Not Cock Robin. To clarify the uniqueness thing a little: the answer is a singular noun phrase beginning with "The".

The Early Bird?

[Chalky] Not the early bird, but you're thinking along the right lines.

The First Cuckoo of Spring?

[Phil] The very thing!

Woohoo! (or something that sounds remarkably like that). And not a lurk in sight.
Pressing on rapidly with

Animal (or Abstract, depending on your point of view)

Unique?

Fictional?

Is it an archosyndicalistic sandwich?

... and a 'woohoo' and 'wahay' [sounding exactly like they're spelled] for Phil's victoreee.

Human?

The bee's knees?

Is it edible?

[Quendalon] Unique? YES
[Software] Fictional? YES
[Chalky] A wossname sarnie? NO
[Tuj] Human? YES
[Rosie] Apiarian patellae? NO
[GL] Edible? NO. Technically yes, but I really don't think you should eat it.

Abstract solely because it's fictional?

An eponymous character?

[Quendalon] Solely fictionally abstract? YES
[NJ] Eponymous character? NO

A male character?

[cfm] Male? YES

I don't have a question; this is just a place-marker to avoid accusations of lurker victory later.

[CdM] This is not an answer, merely an acknowledgement of your statement.

A detective?

This is a question and also an acknowledgement of CdM's non-lurker status.

[GL] Detective? NO

C20 Literature?

This is a question but also a quibble as to whether a non-interrogatory interjection is sufficient to remove lurker status.

[NJ] 20th Century Literature? YES

Is the animal one of the big cats?

[Rosie] A big cat? NO, he's human (see Tuj's question)

Originally written in English?

[NJ] English lit? YES

Fantasy genre?

Harry Potter?

Does an interrogatory interjection remove lurker status if the question is unrelated to the AVMA AOTC?

[Quendalon] Fantasy? NO
[Software] Harry Potter? NO, not eponymous
[CdM] Questionable lurker? NO, you're not getting out of it that easily.

Appears in a series of books?

Why is CdM so convinced he is going to score a lurker's victory? Is he in league with Phil? </ratsmelling>

[NJ] In a series of books? YES *some applause*
[NJ] Am I in cahoots with CdM? One question at a time, please.

James Herriot?

[Software] Herriot? NO
I should add that when I said yes to '20th century Literature' I simply meant that there were books, not necessarily great works of literature.
Also, although I have described the character as not eponymous, I have found that he is mentioned in the title of at least one book.

A detective series?

Is CdM in league with Phil?

Is this person a restorer of antique sewing-machines who keeps an Afghan hound and lives within earshot of St. Paul's in an apartment that appears to be beyond his modest means?

Does asking an apparently relevant question remove lurker status if the question was asked solely for the purpose of removing lurker status?

[cfm] Detectives? NO
[GL] Conspirateur de Moi? NO
[Raak] Your main question? Oh so close! Actually, I lied. NO, not any part of it is correct, and a meaningless note has been made of your completely legal, yet immoral, lurk avoidance (as opposed to lurk evasion, which is strictly illegal).

Is there a connection to espionage?

Any day now we'll be getting phone calls asking 'Do you believe you have ever suffered unfairly at the hands of a lurker?' and offering their services on a 'No Win No Fee' basis (once you've paid the £300 administration charge)

[NJ] Espionage? NO *a couple of giggles from the audience*

Are they books for adults?

Which is worse - lurking or taking successive turns?

[NJ] Books for adults? NO *applause*

Are they comic books?

Did the character first appear before 1960?

[GL] COmic books? NO
[Quendalon] Pre-1960? YES

Tin-Tin?

[Tin-Tin] NO, not eponymous.

Do they share the books with an eponymous character?

[GL] Is there an eponym? Well, only about a fifth of the book titles feature one character's name, but most people would automatically answer YES. It's a definite YES for other media. *applause for a very good question*

Does this character have a "sidekick"?

Violet Elizabeth Bott?

If that isn't right I'll thcweam and thcweam until I'm thick.

[GL] Has a sidekick? NO
[NJ] Violet? NO, thcweam away.

Christopher Robin?

[cfm] Christopher Robin? NO

The Fat Controller?

[Gusset Login] YES, dagnammit, YES !! It was indeed Sir Topham Hatt 1st Bt, of "The Railway Series", often referred to as the "Thomas the Tank Engine" books, although Thomas' name is only in the title of 9 of the 42 books. The Fat Controller is named in only one title, "Thomas and the Fat Controller's Engines".
Nice to get that one finished off for the weekend. And not a hint of a lurk in sight. Please take this green flag in lieu of a baton.

Cool. I never expected having a three year old nephew would help me win anything.

This next one is:

Mineral.

Unique?

[Phil, GL] Excellent =)

Begins with 'P'?

[Tuj] I see you have well and truly nicked my signature question! So I must claim yours in turn.

[Tuj] A one off? Yes
[Quenda] P...? No.

Made of iron?

[cfm] iron? Depending on how loosely you define the terms 'made of' and 'iron' the answer could be either Yes or No.
It is more than 5% steel (which is an alloy of iron).

A building?

*lurks*

[Quenda] Building? No
[CdM] Good to see you, feel free to stop lurking and join in.

Is it larger than a standard kitchen-size refrigerator?

[cfm] > average fridge? No.

A work of art?

Made before 1900?

I'm assuming man-made because it incorporates steel rather than iron.

[Phil] Work of art? No. Although, as always with that question, some people might call it such.
[Quenda] Made before 1900? Yes.

Unique?

A scientific instrument?

Is it in a fixed location?

[Quenders] Apologies, but a change is a good as a rest!

[Rosie] Unique? Yes, still unique.
[Raak] Scientific instrument? No.
[Tuj] Unmoving? Yes.

Military in nature?

[Tuj] A fair cop. Perhaps I will advance to asking whether a thing starts with 'Q'...

Outdoors?

Shaped like a human?

*unlurks*

In the USA?

Located in a museum?

[Quenda] Military in nature? Yes, although perhaps not in nurture. :)
[Rosie] Outside? No
[Chalky] Humanoid? No
[Tuj] 'Merk'n? No
[cfm] In a museum? That's a tough question. Personally, I wouldn't count it as a museum, as such but others might see it differently.

I seem to be very much in the minority. Yes, it's in a museum.

Does it have moving parts?

Even though I have now asked a question, I would like to declare that I am immediately going to revert to lurker status.

[CdM] Moving Prats? (If you're lurking again, I don't have to answer.) No.

Does it have royal associations?

[Tuj] Royal inclinations? *Drowned out by audience aplause and has to repeat* Yes

A sword?

A suit of armour?

Moving Prats? Sounds fun.

A crown?

[cfm] Sword? *More applause* Yes
[Rosie] Suit a'more? No
[Chalurkery] Crown? No

Sword of Mercy?

Military in nature, although not in nurture.

Is this a sword used only for ceremonial purposes?

Pops out of the shrubbery hoping that no one will notice.

The Great Sword of State

Lurker? Me? No! Just a slow starter.

"The Wallace Sword" (William Wallace's Claymore) ?

[Phil] The Gromit Sword? No
[NJ] Greatsword of State? Nope
[Dujon] Ceremonial? Yes
[Quendo] Sword of Mercy? Is the AOTC.

Have a baton with an inch broken off of one end.

[GL] I accept! And with this baton, I dub thee Sir Gusset of Login.

*ahem* This next one is MINERAL.

Is it unique?

[Phil] One of a kind? NO.

Man-made?

[Raak] Man-made? YES.

Begins with Q?

[Tuj] Q-ish? NO.

Made of metal?

Bigger than an average household microwave oven?

Electronic?

[NJ] Metallic? NO.
[Phil] Bigger than a microwave oven? NO.
[Raak] Electronical? NO.

Made of stone?

[cfm] Rocky? NO.

Found indoors?

Ornamental?

Solid?

[Rosie] Can be found indoors? YES.
[Softers] An ornament? Tricky, but I'll go with NO.
[Phil] Solid? PARTLY. *polite applause*

A thermometer?

[cfm] Temperature measurer? NO.

A barometer?

Is water part of this?

Is the AOTC related to light?

[Raak] Atmospheric pressure measurer? NO.
[Chalky] Partly water? My research suggests NO. *audience murmurs*
[Dujon] Light source? NO.

Contains a liquid?

Can I eat it?

Is it used for cleaning?

Contains alcohol?

A Cartesian diver?

Lava Lamp?

[NJ] Contains liquid? YES. *applause*
[Bools] Edible? NO.
[Chalks] Cleaning device? NO.
[Raak] Contains alcohol? My research suggests YES, but that may mislead you.
[Rosie] Cartesian devil? NO.
[GL] Lava lamp? NO. *audience murmurs*

Is the solid part glass?

[Rosie] Glass? According to my research, NO, although glass may have been involved at one point.

Is the solid part plastic?

An insatiable birdie?

(Drinking bird, dipping bird, nodding duck...)

[CdM] Plastic? YES.
[Raak] Unappeasable avian? NO.

A de-icing squirt bottle?

[Rosie] Anti-icy squirty bottly thingy? NO. *audience yawns*

Does it measure anything?

Is it a common household object?

[NJ] Measuring device? NO. *scattered laughter from the audience*
[cfm] Common household object? NO, although a household is one of the most likely places to find it.

Medicinal use in any way?

[Rosie] Curative? NO.

Is this usually dome shaped?

[Dujon] Hemispherical? NO. *laughter from the audience*

Does it have medicinal purposes?

Is it a saftey device?

[NJ] Medicinal use? Still NO.
[GL] Makes you safer? NO.

Does it contain ONLY liquid?

[Phil] Contains only liquid? NO. *applause*

Does it have moving parts?

[Raak] Parts that move? YES, though my answer may mislead you.

A glow stick?

[Phil] Radiant rod? NO.

Was it invented in the last 50 years?

[Tuj] Invented after 1963? NO.

Is the plastic Bakelite?

[Phil] Bakelite? Embarrassingly, I DON'T KNOW; my research doesn't say what kind of plastic(s) are involved.

Is its purpose amusement?

[Rosie] For amusement? YES. *applause, laughter*

Shurely it's not a replica mannequin pis?

[Rosie] Little peeing statue? NO.

A tip-up, clothed/naked lady pen?

[Phil] Pen with lady floating inside? NO. *solitary golf clap from audience*

One of those snow storm globe thingys?

[Softy] Snow globe? NO. *audience murmurs*

Is the mysterious plastic transparent?

[Rosie] Transparent plastic? PARTLY. *applause*

A Sand Sculpture?

Does it have a screen?

[Chalks] Sand sculpture? NO, not sand, nor exactly a sculpture.
[NJ] Has a screen? YES, of a sort, though this answer may mislead you. *nodding and murmuring from audience*

A magic 8 ball?

[CdM] Magic 8-Ball? SIGNS POINT TO YES.
*much applause, throwing of batons, etc*

Hmmm. Maybe I'll use the eight-ball to answer all the questions for this round. That might make it more interesting.
This one is ANIMAL with ABSTRACT connections.

Animal = Human?

Human? It is decidedly so.

Fictional?

Fictional? My reply is no.

Is this person in the arts and entertainment professions?

Arts and Entertainment? My reply is no.

Is the human a politician?

Politician? Yes definitely.

American?

Female?

[Quenders, CdM] Well persevered! I think most, like me, wanted to know the answer but didn't have a clue how to attack it.

American? Don't count on it.
Female? Outlook not so good.

Turns out magic 8-balls don't have many good ways of saying No.

British?

British? My reply is no.

European?

Currently alive?

Never heard of the Magic 8-ball - even after looking it up to check.

European? You may rely on it.
Currently alive? My sources say no.

Begins with a P?

Begins with a P? Very doubtful.

Known for military achievements?

Well known in UK?

Is the AOTC a dead male European politician whose name doesn't begin with a P?

Known for military leadership? Very doubtful
Well known in UK? Reply hazy try again
Dead male non-P European politician? Signs point to yes.

Did this person die after 1900?

Died after 1900? Without a doubt.

Did this person die after 2000?

Was he a francophone?

Well known in UK?

All right. Reluctantly I think I need to abandon the 8-ball, or I risk confusing and infuriating you all.
Die after 2000? No.
Francophone? I can't tell from the sources I have checked. French was not his mother tongue, but there are some reasons to believe he may at least have had a working knowledge of the language.
Well-known in the UK? Concentrate and ask again. Oh, sorry. I do not think that, at the present time, you would say that. But the abstract connection is at least somewhat well-known.

Quisling?

Quisling? It is decidedly so! An impressive leap there. The answer is indeed Vidkun Quisling, leader of the Norwegian collaborationist government from 1942-45. Tuj asked the wrong question. One baton inscribed "with best wishes, Adolf" handed over.

Yes, well, sometimes an answer just jumps into your head and you have to take a guess.
This next one is ABSTRACT with ANIMAL connections

Animal = Human?

[Software] human animal? - YES is probably the most helpful answer

Fictional?

(The next question is: "Is this person in the arts and entertainment professions?")

[CdM] Fictional - YES
The next answer is NO

Actually, the best answer to Software would have been YESish and NO

Gollum?

[Chalky] 'well, sometimes an answer just jumps into your head and you have to take a guess' - this one happens to be wrong

is the animal a deity?

assumption alert

[Phil] Godlike animal? - NO *a couple of audience members exchange significant glances*

Begins with... um... R?

Proverbial?

Is the animal unique?

Is the animal mythical?

Aslan?

[Tuj] R-start? - NO
[Quen] Proverb? - Not as such but *some applause*
[CdM] Just the one? YES and NO
[Phil] Mythical? - YES and NO
[Raak] Aslan? - NO

Guardian Angel?

Mass assumption alert

[Software] Grauniad Angle? - NO

A character from a book (or books)?

[Phil] Character in book? - The human animal appears in at least one literary work.

A well known phrase or saying?

Is the AOTC more than one creature?

[Chalky] I say, I say, I say? - NO
[Tuj] >1 creature? - YES! *relieved applause*

All the creatures on Noah's Ark?

[Raak] The animals went in seven by seven? - NO

Devilish connection?

Does this human animal have any connection to nonhuman animals?

Is the abstract part the occupation of a human?

Yes, don't forget the abstract

[Software] Devilish? - NO
[Quen] human/nonhuman connection (until they caught him at it)? NO, not particularly, except in the context of the AOTC
[Dujon] Abstract = Occupation? - NO

Is the AOTC the title of a book?

[Tuj] Book title? - NO (at least not one I've heard of)

Bigfoot?

[Software] Size 17? - NO

Are these creatures different species - apart from the human?

First literary appearance before 1900?

[Chalky] multi-species? NO - (There's a misapprehension behind your question - I assume based on my answer to Tuj. I counted the human as a creature) So to be clear, the AOTC includes a human and another creature.
[Quen] First written about pre 1900? - YES *some chuckles in the audience*

Alice in Wonderland?

Is Software's question a 'book title' which Tuj asked and to which you have replied NO?

Thanks for clarification on the creature issue :)

Is the human named ie. Jonah and The Whale?

[Software] Miss Liddell and the Magic Mushrooms? - NO (I would consider that a 'Book Title'
[Chalky] Named Human? - YES *appreciative murmurs*

BTW - I've done some research and can't find a book title that matches the AOTC - though there are several which incorporate most of it, at least one of which is by a well-known writer. I don't think it's a useful approach for you.

Is the non-human a mythical creature?

Beginning to get somewhere

[Tuj] Non-human mythical? - NO

Is the human from the Mediterranean?

[Tuj] One of those 'Mediterranean' types? - YES

Silvio Berlusconi?

Shurely he is mythical by now.

Perseus?

Can I still pretend I'm lurking after making a guess?

First literary appearance BC?

[Software] Super Silvio? - NO
[GLogin] Perseus? - NO *some applause* (and NO)
[Raak] BCE initially? - YES

Jason and the Golden Fleece?

Is this from the Old Testament?

[Quen] Jason &c? - NO
[Chalky] OT? - NO

Is the non-human creature named?

Was this fellow an early aviator?

[Quendalon] e.g. Mrs Tiggywinkle? - NO
[Dujon] Icarine? - NO

Is the named human known to us by just a single (i.e., one word) name?

[CdM] Single name? - YES

Plato's man (i.e. a plucked chicken)?

Greek mythology?

[Raak] Plato's Man? - NO
[Quen] Greek Mythology? - YES (the human is from Greek mythology)

Theseus and The Minataur?

Pasiphaë and the Bull?

[Chalky] Theseus etc.? - NO
[Quen] Pasiphaë etc.? - NO
I said the human is from Greek mythology

Do the human and the non-human appear in combination in Greek mythology?

Does the Human's name begin with 'H'?

[Quen] Do the human and the non-human appear in combination in Greek mythology? - NO (and a good question)

Ahem *coughs*

Does the creature *belong* to the human from mythology

Looking for the link ...
Not a well known phrase or saying
Not a book title
Not a Greek myth as such
Not a proverb

[Chalky] H.....? - NO - didn't forget - just got interrupted.
All your statements are correct
You can derive from what I have told you that we have a mythical greek human and a non-mythical animal. If you get these you will not quite have the AOTC, but that will be obvious.

Is there a constellation named after either of them?

[GLogin] Constellation? - NO (at least not in the European tradition and the current standard list)

Actually, there has been a constellation proposed as the animal, but it never caught on and is not in current use. (Thank You Wikipedia)

Is it the name of a band?

Is the non-human a bird?

[NJ] Chalky's list had a question above it, note.

Is the AOTC formatted as " someone AND THE something "?

[Chalky] Creature 'owned' by human? - NO
[Phil] Band Name? - YES (or at least the name of a band is included in the AOTC, but I'd never heard of it - thank you Google)
[Tuj] Birdy creature? - NO
[Chalky] Someone & the Something? - YES *audience perks up* But that's not the entire AOTC

Is the animal a mammal?

Clutching at straws for anything that might trigger some inspiration.

Is it the name of a song?

Is the non-human aquatic?

[Phil] Mammal? - NO
[Quen] A song? - NO (I'm not going to bother to google that, so I may be wrong!!)
[Tuj] Watery? - NO
I'll see if I can think of a clue.

Is it a title of any sort?

I'm currently stumped.

Are either of them a reptile?

Quite a big nudge

[Quen] A title? - NO
[GLogin] A reptile? - Technically NO, but in common parlance some people may consider the non-human animal to be at least reptilian in some characteristics.

A couple of clues:
1. The format of the answer is actually 'THE something abstract OF someone AND THE something
2. Consider what else has come down to us from the Greeks apart from their myths and legends

Does the 'something abstract' begin with P?

Even more stumped than before.

The Ballad of John and Yoko?

Sorry, couldn't resist.

[Quen] P-abstract? - YES
[Phil] Christ, you know it ain't easy? - NO

The Paradox of Achilles and the Tortoise?

See, it wasn't that hard!

[Phil] YES!! It is Zeno's Paradox of Achilles and the Tortoise which gets most of a chapter to itself in 'Gödel Escher, Bach'

Here, have half a baton and a quarter of a baton and an eighth of a baton, and ........

The "reptilian in some characteristics" was the giveaway, once I spotted it. I am a herpetophobe, and once ran away from a girlfriend's pet tortoise, which she was holding to try and show to me. It was rather embarrassing, and gave me nightmares, but up to that point I'd thought my phobia only stretched to snakes.

Hidden text

Just typing that has made me curl my legs up under my chair, rather than under the desk where I can't see.

So, our next offering is

Mineral

The plane from "Snakes on a Plane" after all the snakes have been removed?

[NJ] Ah. I'd forgotten all about the whole "Achilles and the tortoise" bit; I always just think of it as Zeno's paradox.

[CdM] The plane from the film I deliberately haven't even seen the trailer for? NO

Made of metal?

[CdM] Yes but Zeno had 9 paradoxes including the one I quoted in handing over the baton, which is related to, but not identical to 'Achilles..'

Unique?

[CdM] Good guess - after all, simply "the absence of snakes" would've been abstract, right?

Man made?

[NJ] Tortoises are reptiles in the order Testudines. What technicality are you thinking of that that cancels out?

[NJ] Made of metal? Partially
[Tuj] Unique? YES
[GL] Man-made? YES
[NJ] Have a toffee for being the only person so far not to have mentioned snakes/reptiles.

Sculptural?

[GLogin] I plead stupidity. For some reason I'd always thought that chelonians were a separate class and I didn't bother to check.

A bridge?

[NJ] Sculptural? NO
[Raak] A bridge? YES *Applause*

London Bridge?

[NJ] I always get that one confused with the Fable of the Tortoise and the Hare.

[Quendalon] London Bridge? NO

The Golden Gate?

In the USA?

The Sydney Harbour Bridge?

[NJ] I just checked Wikipedia; I hadn't ever heard of (or perhaps had forgotten; I read GEB two-thirds of my lifetime ago) several of Zeno's paradoxes. But the ones you were referring to I simply classify together in my mind as the "Zeno didn't understand infinite sequences paradox".

In UK?

In Asia?

[Raak] Golden Gate? NO
[NJ] USA? YES *Applause*
[CdM] Sydney Harbour? NO
[Chalky] UK? NO
[Quendalon] Asia? NO

In New York New York?

[NJ] NY NY? NO

Chappaquiddick bridge?

In a state on the Eastern Seaboard

[Software] Chupa Chups Bridge? NO
[NJ] Right-hand side state? YES *some more applause*

The Talmadge Memorial Bridge?

Is it well known because of an incident that happened there?

[Chalky] Talmadge? NO
[NJ] Well known because of an incident? NO

The Seven Mile Bridge?

(on the route down through the FL keys)

[CdM] 7 Mile Bridge? YES - dang, you're good! Have this baton made of recycled railway line, and well done!

Well, that was unexpected!

It was in my head because Geoguessr deposited me there a week or so ago.

VEGETABLE and possibly ANIMAL

Is the vegetable wood?

Is the animal leather?

Is it bigger than the 7 mile bridge?

Is there one in your [CdM's] home?

Begins with a P?

A vegetarian meal of some sort?

Wood? No.
Leather? No.
Bigger than 7-mile bridge? Not really a well-defined question, but the answer would have to be No if anything.
One in my home? I am pretty sure (not 100% certain) the answer is currently no, although I have had the AOTC in my home at various times.
Begins with P? One of the words on the card begins with a P.
Vegetarian meal? No. *some applause, nonetheless*

Is it a sandwich?

Sandwich? No. :-)

Potable/Edible?

Is it liquid at room temperature?

Potable/edible? Yes.
Liquid at room temperature? Yes.

Carbonated?

Is the AOTC a brand name?

Is it a condiment?

Carbonated? No.
Brand name? No.
Condiment? No.

Is it a type of tea?

Tea? No.

Alcoholic?

Is it normally consumed cold?

Alcoholic? No.
Normally consumed cold? No. [SuzieR] Welcome!

Contains coffee?

Contains coffee? No.

A type of soup?

Tea?

Sometimes served with milk, don't you know.

Is the animal element dairy produce?

That's ten noes in a row

Soup? No.
Tea? Still No.
Dairy? No.

Is it a beverage?

Is it medicinal?

A beverage? No.
Medicinal? No.

Is it sold in an average supermarket?

Is its normal use as a foodstuff

Just 'cos it's edible doesn't mean that's its primary purpose.

Sold in an average supermarket? Hmmm. Good question. It can be. I have certainly seen it for sale in regular supermarkets in the US (and perhaps in other countries, though I am not sure). But would I expect to find it if I wandered into an average supermarket here in Australia, or in the UK? Probably not. So I will go with No.
Normal use as a foodstuff? Yes. (But a good assumption-checking question!)

Argan Oil?

Still with bits of goat mixed in.

Argan oil? No.

Is it consumed by itself?

Is the P-word on the card paste?

Consumed by itself? No. *applause*
P = paste? No.

Is it a sauce for a dish?

A sauce? Yes. *applause*

More likely to be consumed in USA?

As per

Pasta sauce?

More likely to be consumed in USA? Um. Than where? It is more likely to be consumed in the USA than in some other places, and less likely to be consumed in the USA than in other other places. It is almost certainly more likely to be consumed in the USA than in the UK, if that is what you mean. :-)
Pasta sauce? No.

Does it normally contain chili?

Contains chill? Yes. *applause*

Tabasco Pepper Sauce?

Tabasco? No. (I think I would have classified that as a condiment.)

Originates in Asia?

Asian? No.

*ouch*

CdM - ooops. Thought I'd typed 'than in the UK' but didn't check preview. Thanks for clarification. I have a hunch this may be a foodstuff I haven't heard of so will withdraw from the chase ..

Pico de gallo?

Pico de gallo? No. *some applause*

*changes mind* Might this be classed as a Mexican sauce?

Piri-piri

aka peri-peri or pili-pili

Mole poblano?

Mexican sauce? Yes.
Piri-peri-pili? No.
Mole Poblano? Yes! It is indeed the Mexican sauce (or class of sauces, really) made from spices, peppers, nuts, and chocolate. And if you have never tasted a good Pollo con Mole Poblano, put that on your bucket list right now. The "animal" is because the sauce can be made with (typically chicken) stock or just with water.
[Q] Here. There's a baton on this plate somewhere.

[CdM] I will eat my way through the entire dish until I find the baton - and then keep on going! A good mole sauce dish is delicious indeed. Now I'm hungry...

Anyway, I'm currently busy in town. I will post a new AVMA item when I get home in a few hours.

By my decree, this one is MINERAL.

Unique?

[Chalky] Well? Had you heard of it?

it is solid?

[Cdm] I'd heard of "mole", but not the "poblano" bit.

Begins with a P?

(Presumably it's not a sandwich)

Begins with a Q?

[Phil] I had decided that I would accept "mole" as close enough. In most people's minds, I think mole = mole poblano.

Made of stone?

I knew 'Mole mole' but not 'Mole Poblano'

Is it metal?

[CdM] Not only knew it but have made it - and also thought it might be the answer which is why I asked the 'mexican' question. I have always believed '.. mole' to be '.. sauce' ie. Guacamole. Be that as it may, and it may not - Quendo slipped in there before me which is probably for the best given my schedule over the next few days :)

Sorry for the delay

[CdM] Unique? NO.
[Phil] Solid? YES. *applause*
[Tuj] Begins with 'P'? NO, not this time.
[CdM] Begins with 'Q'? NOPE.
[NJ] Rock? Technically YES.
[Chalks] Metal? NO.

Made of glass?

[Phil] Glass? YES. *audience murmurs*

Ornamental?

Man-made?

[Softers] Ornamental? SOMETIMES. *audience murmurs*
[Raak] Man-made? NO.

Smaller than a toaster?

Is it made of obsidian?

[Tuj] Smaller than a toaster? N/A.
[GL] Obsidian? YES, that's the word on the card!

Passing a black, glassy baton...

*says gosh*

*is impressed*

Oh. I'd expected something more specific.

OK, this one is ABSTRACT/ANIMAL.

Fictional?

[Tuj] Fictional? Yes

Fictional human?

[GL] I figured that I might want to try something obscure next time I have the baton, so I thought I'd build up some compensatory karma in advance.

In literature?

Male?

Begins with a P?

[Quenda] Fictional Human? No
[NJ] Literature? Yes
[Phul] Male? Assumed to be but I don't remember it being confirmed. I'm saying Yes.
[Tuj] Begins with P? No.

Fictional Animal?

[Chalky] Fictional aminal? Yes

Talking animal?

Is/was the author of this fictional animal female?

[Quendo] Talking? Yes.
[CdM] From the mind of a woman? No.

An animal native to asia?

[NJ] Lives in asia? No. *Some mutters of disagreement from the audience*

First written of before 1950?

Mammal?

[CdM] pre-1950? Yes
[Quando] Mammalian? No.

Ignore me, I accidentally posted twice in a row.

[Quenda] I'm sorry, did you say something?

Begins with Q?

Cheshire cat?

Cats are native to Asia, but the Cheshire cat is native to Cheshire.

[CdM] Q...? No.
[Quen Dalon] Grinning Cat? No. Also cat's are mammals.

A single individual animal?

Is it a bird?

First written of before 1900?

[GL] I thought that when you said "No" you meant "Yes."

[NJ] Singular? Yes.
[Suzierocket] bird? No.
[Quendal On] Pre-1900? No.

Does this animal also exist in the real world?

[Suzierocket] Is it a real animal? If you mean is this fictional talking animal also a real talking animal... No.
If you mean is it a member of a species that also exists in the real world... Also, no.

Smaug?

[CdM] Smaug? The very worm. Have a golden baton filtched from the dragon's horde.

All right. It has been a while since I have done an ABSTRACT. This also has ANIMAL connections.

Fictional character?

Fictional character? No.

The Origin of Species?

If this is right the cries of 'Fix!' will be deafening.

A human invention?

An emblem?

Bestiality?

Not that sort of animal connection? I'll get my coat.

TOoS? No
Human invention? No.
Emblem? No.
Animal Husbandry? No.

A metaphorical animal?

Metaphorical animal? No.

Is the AOTC a single word?

Single word? Yes.

Unique?

Unique? No.

Related to the Arts?

Related to the Arts? The best answer is No. There are connections—probably a lot of them; for example the AOTC certainly shows up in book titles and song titles—but I don't think they will be useful to you.

Is the animal connection human?

Animal connection human? Yes, but not exclusively so.

Is it an emotion or feeling?

Does it start with an S?

Does it start with a silent 'P'?

Does it end in Y?

Is the word on the card a noun?

Emotion or feeling? Yes. *applause*
Start with S? No.
Start with silent P? No.
End in Y? No.
Noun? Yes. (It is also a verb, but I am treating the AOTC as referring to the noun.)

Hunger?

Is it normally considered negative?

Attributed more commonly to one sex--reasonably or otherwise?

Hunger? No.
Normally considered negative? Yes.
Attributed more to one sex? I don't think so. I'm unaware of either an objective difference or a pervasive stereotype.

OK, I have done a little research now, and discovered that at least one aspect of the AOTC is—objectively—associated more with women than men.

Does it begin with a Q?

Begin with Q? No.

A pedantic clarification. I answered Yes to "Emotion or feeling?", and that is clearly the best answer. But we might be hesitant about applying those terms to non-human animals, so I should note that there are also senses of the AOTC that go beyond emotion/feeling.

Does this involve killing?

Sorry I'm late, it's the darned traffic.

Involve killing? Not usually. Occasionally, yes.

Would this type of behaviour be classified as a syndrome or even illness?

Syndrome? Well, first, it isn't a "type of behaviour" as such, though it certainly can be associated with certain behaviours. And although it can sometimes be associated with a syndrome/illness, it isn't in itself one.

Is it normally considered rational in reasonably common circumstances?

Do you know of an emoticon which expresses this?

Does it start with a non-silent 'P'?

Is it drepressing?

Normally considered rational? *audience applauds the question* No. In some circumstances quite the contrary. Although it is not always considered irrational, either.
Emoticonned? I was not aware of one, but the google does give me examples. Mind you, if you had just shown me these examples, I would not have identified them as the AOTC.
Begin with non-silent P? Yes. Of course.
Depressing or drepressing? No, not in general. Maybe in some specific circumstances.

Paranoia?

Paranoia? No. (I did actually think about making that the AOTC when setting this AVMA.)

Panic?

Panic? Yes! *throws the baton in Quendalon's general direction and runs away screaming*

Eeek! Er, I mean, yes! Of course! Success!

Our next selection is obscurely ANIMAL.

Unique?

[Tuj] Unique? YES.

Human?

[Tuj] Possesses personhood? YES.

alive now?

Male?

[NJ] Among the living? YES.
[GL] Male? NO.

A member of the Morniverse?

Does she begin with a Queen?

[Tuj] Player of Mornington Crescent? UNLIKELY, but since I don't know your real names there's no way to be sure...
[CdM] Name prefaced with female monarchical title? NO.

European?

In the entertainment business?

A sportswoman?

[Q] The best answers are often the scrupulously accurate ones =)

Has she received an honour from the Queen?

Over thrity?

[CdM] From Europe? YES.
[NJ] In the business of providing entertainment? YES.
[Tuj] Famed athlete? NO.
[Raak] Received award from female monarch? NO.

A thespian?

[NJ] Dramaturge? NO.

Does she begin with P?

Also, you forgot to answer GL's question: is she over thrity? Enquiring midns wnat to konw.

[CdM] Do any words on the card begin with 'P'? NO.
[GL] Is this personage over thrity years old? YSE.

A singer?

[Tuj] Vocalist? NO.

Is she a broadcaster?

[Chalks] Casts broadly? NO.

OK. Does she begin with Q, then?

Is she a writer?

[CdM] Starts with 'Q'? NO.
[Chalks] Writes? YES. *applause*

Does she write for television?

Has she published a novel within the last year?

[nights] Writes for the telly? NO. (In the interests of full disclosure, she has done a bit of TV writing but is not known for it.)
[CdM] Novel with publication date after June 16, 2012? NO.

Has she published a novel within the last ten years?

Is she aged over fifty?

Is she married?

British?

[GL] Published a novel since 2003? YES.
[Chalko] Over fifty years old? YES.
[Phil] Wedded? YES.
[Tuj] Brit? YES.

Tanith Lee?

[GL] Tanith Lee? YES. *wild applause*

I guess that wasn't so obscure after all?

*tosses Gusset Login the baton through a gate of agate, a gate of blue steel and a terrible gate of black flame*

*googles Tanith Lee*

Well Guessed Guss!

I've only heard of Tanith Lee because my local sci-fi/fantasy book group are meant to be reading some of her stuff next month. The guess was meant to rule her out and confirm my own sanity... which clearly worked well.

Time for an ABSTRACT, I think

The letter P?

Anarcho-Syndicalism?

[Tuj] P...? No.
[Chalky] Anarcho-Syndicalism? No.

Human construct?

Fictional?

[CdM] Human construct? I'm going to say No.
[Tuj] Fictional? I've not seen evidence of it for a while but No, not fictional.

Connected with the natural world?

Related to perception?

[GL] Do you know which of Lee's books you'll be reading? Her 70s sci-fi/fantasy is excellent, but I gather her style shifted over time and I'm not sure what the more recent stuff is like. But if you're reading her Tales of the Flat Earth stories or The Birthgrave, you're in for a treat.

[Chalky] From nature? Unclear, much like the human construct thing. I'm saying Yes, with reservations
[Quendalon] Perception? Not closely related, but possibly yes.

[Quendalon] I'll find out on Saturday which one I get but the whole gammet of her work is being covered as far as I can tell.

One of the seven deadly sins?

[Chaky] A sin? No. *Laughter*

Generally considered to be pleasing?

[Quend] Positive? Yes.

Is it an emotion or feeling?

[Tuj] Emothing or feeling? Yes.

Is there more than one word on the card?

[Quendalon] Multi-word? No.

Does it begin with either P or Q?

[CdM] P... or Q...? No.

Related to attachment?

[cfm] Attachment? It can be but not always, depending on your definition of attachment.

Is it some form of familial bond?

[Dujon] Bond, Familial Bond? No.

Is it an '.. ism'?

[Chalky] ...ism? No.

Felt only by humans?

Does it end in "-ness"?

[Quendalon] Only human? I have seen it ascribed to other animals but who can tell? (Hence my earlier answers regarding human constructs and nature)
[Phil] ...ness? Not on the card but a reasonable synonym does.

Does it begin with a letter from the first half of the alphabet [incl M]?

Joy?

Empathy?

[Chakly] A-M...? Yes.
[Phil] Joy? No.
[cfm] Empathy? No.

Is it directed at someone or something outside oneself?

[Quendalon] Targetted? Yes.

Generosity?

Love?

[Chalky] Generosity? No. *Much applause*
[Phil] Love? No.

Does the word begin with a vowel?

[Chalky] A... E... or I...? No.

Does it end -ion?

[Tuj] ...ion? No.

Is it an '.. ity'?

[Chalky] ...ity? No.
The word on the card does have a fair number of acceptable synonyms, many of which would elicit different response to some recent questions. I'm not sure this is your best line of attack.

Summary/Clarification/Hints
This is a single word describing a felling or emotion directed by humans (and possibly other animals) towards something. Generally it is considered positive for at least one of the people involved.
It starts with a consonant between B and M (G) and doesn't end with 'ity', 'ion', 'ism' or 'ness'. Although synonyms ending with at least two of those option and beginning with completely different letters may be acceptable answers.

Is it a noun?

[Quend] Noun? Yes.

Can it be used as a name?

I think the fact we've dropped to this poor line of attack is no-one's had a good idea how to approach it!

Friendship?

Is it typically directed at a single person (in any given instance) or at multiple people at once?

[Tuj] Can it be used as a name? Not traditionally but I wouldn't put it past some people.
[Quendalon] Friendship? No.
[CdM] Directed at a single person? In the last year, I have directed it at individuals, couples, groups, inanimate objects and the results of blind chance.

Gratitude?

[cfm] Gratitude? Yes. Have mine and a baton.

[GL] Similar sentiments to you, dear. Let's try VEGETABLE AND MINERAL

Is it a geographical location?

Is the vegetable wood?

[NJ] Here or there? NO.
[GL] Wooden? NO.

Unique?

[Q] Unique? NO

Edible?

Is the mineral metal?

Is it a sandwich?

Would it normally be found in a sandwich?

Is it bigger than a breadbox?

[Raak] Edible? YES
[CdM] Metallic? NO
[Tuj] Two slices plus? NO
[Q] Big as a loaf or two? NO
[GL] Sandwichable? NO

Wet?

Is the mineral salt?

Tea?

Is it a foodstuff?

[Chalky] Watery? I think the best answer is YES, but in practice, it would be to varying degrees.
[Raak] Salty? The best answer to your question is NO, that is not the primary mineral ingredient. But I know of at least one instance where salt is involved.
[GL] Cuppa? NO, that is not the AOTC. But YES, tea may be involved.
[CdM] Foodstuff? NO. *audience interest increases*

Is it found in a typical Western home?

Is it generally considered valuable?

Is it medicinal?

[Q] Western staple? YES---though not as common as say, a carton of milk or a pair of scissors.
[GL] Pricey? NO.
[Chalky] Medicinal? I think the best answer is NO. *murmurs from the audience*

Is alcohol involved?

[Phil] Alcoholic? NO, the AOTC does not involve alcohol. But there is a peripheral connection.
[Chalky] By the same token, I guess that's true for your question, too.

Is the AOTC the name of a meal?

Is it always both vegetable and mineral, or is it sometimes just vegetable or just mineral?

[Chalky] Name that meal? NO.
[Q] One not both? YES. While the vast majority of the AOTC is both mineral and vegetable, sometimes the answer is just one of those things. *applause*

Begins with a P?

Hmm.

Is its primary function to be ingested?

Energy drinks?

Would it normally be consumed towards the end of a meal?

[Tuj] Having the usual? NO, not this time.
[Q] Primarily ingestible? NO.
[Chalky] Energy drink? NO.
[Phil] Finishing touch? NO.

Intended for topical application?

[Q] A dab here or there? YES. *generous applause from the audience*

suncream?

Lube?

How naughty!

[Chalky] SPF-something? NO.
[Q] Slippery stuff? NO. But I like the way you think. :-)

Moisturiser?

Condoms?

[Raak] Day or night cream? NO. *audience applauds nonetheless*
[Chalky] Barrier method? NO.

Cleanser?

[Chalky] Good clean fun? NO.

Lipsalve?

Toothpaste?

[Q] Good clean teeth? NO.
[Chalky] Lip salve? Well, not exactly -- hence my equivocating on the question of whether the thing was medicinal. The AOTC is actually the purely decorative (and much more fun) relative of lip salve --lip gloss-- but I think you are due the baton. Here, take this miniature one from my handbag! I hope Plum Passion is your shade.

for the win

[cfm] Mighty generous of you - in my mind lip balm, lip gloss and lip stick were also queuing for the limelight .. it was just a matter of timing.

Now - dare I unleash this ABSTRACT with ANIMAL connections?

Fictional?

Animal = human?

a work of art?

A philosophy?

The bee's knees?

round up

[Gusset Login] Fictional? NO
[CdM] Animal = Human? YES
[NotJohn] Work Of Art? NO
[Phil] A philosophy? Erm .. NO
[Tuj] Knees of bees? NO

A human invention?

Associated with governance?

[Tuj] Human invention? YES
[Quendalon] Associated with governance? YES *audience stirs*

Surely it's anarcho-syndicalism then?

[Tuj] *fingers crossed*

[Tuj, Phil] Anarcho-syndicalism? Shurely NOT I'm afraid *audience murmuration*

Begins with a P?

Phew!

Related to the making of laws?

Associated with a specific individual?

A specific style of governance?

[Tuj] P? NO
[cfm] Related to law-making? YES
[CdM] Specific individual? YES
[nights] Specific style of governance? YES

Marxism?

[Gusset Login] Marxism? NO

Is the specific individual a politician?

Summat like democracy and all people being equal and all that sort of malarky?

[CdM] A politician? NO
[Dujon] Democracy equality malarky? NO

Named for the individal it's associated with?

[Quendalon] Named for the individual it's associated with? Am not clear what your "it's" is referencing (the AOTC?) - however I will respond with a cautious YES.

Does the individual's name appear as part of the AOTC?

[CdM] Name on AOTC? Not exactly .. *audience applauds question*

Is it Thatcherism?

Is the individual an ancient historic figure?

[nights] Thatcherism? NO
[cfm] Ancient historic figure? Could be.

Does the identity of the specific individual change over time?

That is, at any moment there is just one such individual, but it is not always the same person.

[CdM] Changing identity? YES *more applause*

A dictatorship?

Associated with a particular country?

Is there a religious connection in addition to the connection to governance?

[Phil] Dictatorship? NO
[Raak] Associated with a particular country? YES
[cfm] Also a religious connection? YES

Connected with Christianity?

A monarch?

Pope Francis?

[Quendalon] Christianity connection? Yes-ish
[Raak] A monarch? YES!!!! Yesyesyes!!!
[cfm] NO - not the Popey.

The King or Queen of England, Defender of the Faith

[Raak] The King or Queen of England, Defender of the Faith? Absolutely YES. That's the ANIMAL bit - now guess the ABSTRACT *audience senses a dénouement*

The British monarchy?

[Raak] The British monarchy certainly relates to the AOTC but you are travelling away from the solution. Most questions so far have centred on the Animal connection - the Abstract is yet to be resolved.

Order of Succession to the UK Throne?

Hair apparent?

[Phil] Order of Succession? NO
[GL] Hirsuteness? NO

The Supreme Governor of the Church of England?

Thought I'd answered this earlier ..

.. sorry to keep you. Now ..
[Raak] The Supreme Governor of the Church of England? If that's what she also is then I am bound to say YES.
However, that is not the AOTC. Having established some guesses back that Her Maj is the 'animal' perhaps some lateral thinking is required to find the 'abstract'.

In Her Majesty's case is this an event of some sixty years ago?

[Hi Dujon] An event? NO

.. can't reply if no-one asks :(

Am shortly away from the 'net until approx 2200 BST

Summary

We are looking for the name of a specific style of government. It was named after the current Queen of England and other people but only one at a time. It isn't Monarchy and doesn't begin with P.

Have I missed anything?

Divine Right?

Ends with -ism?

[Gusset Login] Thanks for your brave attempt at a summary ..
.. however - we are actually looking for an ABSTRACT which has the Queen of England as its ANIMAL connection ( and it still feels somewhat treasonable typing that ...)

As you were ;-)

continuum

NOT a style of government ... NOT a title. It certainly has the Queen of GB, Ireland, Dominions blah be blah etc. as its core but if you guessed a memorial ceramic plate with her face on it .. well that would be mineral obviously ... but you'd be closer than you have been thus far :-)

The clever brigade

Elizabethanism?

It is I, Rosie.

[Tcb] Elizabethanism? NO.
My bad - didn't reply to [Raak] and [Quendalon] NO not divine right nor an -ism.

Is it a doctrine?

[Rosie] Thanks for joining in - but NO - it's not a doctrine or a philosophy etc.

Most of questions along these lines related purely to the Animal connection - very few have asked what type of Abstract this is. 'Is it a work of art' came the closest. For those that can be bothered I would suggest forget all that has gone before - concentrate on standard Abstract questioning ..

Coinage?

[gil] Coinage? NO - but *audience applauds this line of questioning*

The Divine Right of Kings?

Given that "to do with religion" was established.

[Phil] The Divine Right of Kings? Still NO. Religious connection was established to confirm the Animal, ie. Her Maj.
Having said that - one of the words in the AOTC is 'God'. < < < clue!

"Dieu et Mon Droit"?

straw-clutching

"God Save The King/Queen/Other"?

[Phil] Mon Dieu! Drat! NON
[Raak] God Save The King/Queen/Other? - that well-known phrase or saying [another standard Abstract question that wasn't asked] is about as close as it gets without being the AOTC
*audience cheering in desperation willing Raak, or anyone really, even a lurker, to make the leap .. *

Who are you, the Queen of England?

The National Anthem?

Is this an alternative title for the monarch?

Honi soit qui mal y pense?

[Phil] Pass us a straw, mate.

Allelulia Phil!

The Abstract is a SONG - the SONG is the AOTC which was 'The British National Anthem - God Save Our Gracious Queen' [who was the Animal connection all the way through]
Thank you Phil - here's a victorious, happy and glorious baton ...

Golly, thanks Chalky. Long did you reign over us with that one - chortle chortle!
Next up is

Mineral

Liquid?

Metal?

Commonly found in the household?

[Rosie] Liquid? NO
[CHalky] Metal? NO
[Quendalon] Household object? NO

Is it a mineral [ a naturally occurring inorganic solid etc] ?

[Chalky] A (well-defined) mineral? YES

Perovskite?

[Raak] Perovskite? NO
Clarification: I meant that it is composed of a mineral.

Man made?

[GL] Man made? Ummm, YES is the best answer, I believe as it would not be recognisable as what it is without mankind.

Asbestos?

Is it unique?

Does it naturally occur in nature?

[Raak] Asbestos? NO
[Quendalon] Unique? YES
[nights] Naturally in nature? Speaking strictly about the AOTC, NO.

Is it used as a building material?

Is the metal extracted from an ore (e.g. Aluminium from Bauxite)?

Does it move?

Is it a landmark?

[Rosie] Building material? The AOTC is not, but the substance of which it is composed is.
[Dujon] metal from an ore? NO
[Tuj] Does it move? NO
[GL] Landmark? NO

A cairn?

A wahoo from 60 yards.

Made from stone/rock?

Is it in Europe?

[Rosie] A cairn? NO
[Chalky] Made from stone/rock? YES. *some applause*
[Tuj] In Europe? YES

Made of diamond?

A natural geographical feature?

A mine?

[GL] Diamond? NO
[Rosie] Natural feature? NO
[Raak] Mine? NO

In the UK?

Smaller than a Range Rover?

[Tuj] In the UK? NO
[Chalky] Smaller than Range Rover? YES

A monument?

The Blarney Stone?

[Software] A monument? NO *audience stirs*
[Chalky] De Blarney Stone? NO

Begins with a P?

A statue?

[Tuj] P word? NO
[Chalky] A statue? YES *much applause*

In Italy?

[Software] In Italy? NO

The statue of liberty?

The one in France, obviously.

In Denmark?

[GL] Liberté? NON
[Chalky] .dk? NEJ

Is this a creation of Claude Michel?

[Dujon] Claude Michel? ~~who?~~ NO

This statue - a female human?

[Chalky] Female human statue? YES *Applause*

Venus de Milo?

[Chalky] VdM (any relation to CdM, I've often wondered?) - YES.
Congratulations, may I pass on this severed-arm-shaped baton to you.

*curtseys*

Thanks Phil. Not sure why I chased that one - given my absence from the internets, therefore this game, for the next week. I guess I enjoyed it :)

* tosses severed-arm-shaped baton into the air hoping someone will catch it before it lands and shatters into a thousand pieces*

*reaches for the baton, but not too aggressively on account of having held it twice recently*

Shall I grab it? Oh, all right then.

It is Abstract with Animal and Mineral connections.

Animals human?

Begins with a P?

*jumps*

The title of some work?

[Rosie] Human? Mostly, I would say
[Tuj] Pish? No P anywhere
[cfm] Title of some work? Googling actually says YES, not sure that it is helpful though.

A human invention?

Do the humans have a common purpose?

Is a horse likely to be associated with this person?

Supernatural?

[Tuj] Homogeneous? NO
[Rosie] Common purpose? Mmmm, maybe but largely NO
[Duj] Horsey? Perhaps figuratively but mainly NO
[Quen] Eerie? NO

A well knwon phrase or saying?

Is the mineral aspect metal?

[GL] Adage? YESish
[Phil] Metalic? NO not exclusively.

Whoops!

I must also rap my own wrist for just noticing that I omitted Vegetable from the definition.

Is the vegetable element wood?

Does the abstract result from human activity? (eg urbanisation)

Are any of the aspects a geographical location?

*taking an interest ..*

Wow - a whole week away and not a lot has happened.
So we have an Abstract with Animal Vegetable Mineral connections and have ascertained that it's a sort of well-known phrase or saying?

Is it a place?

[Phil] Wood? NO not exclusively
[Rosie] Global Warming? Mmmm, interesting but probably NO
[GL] Geographic? NO non specific but much rarer in some locations
[Chalky] Place? NO specific location.

A naturally occurring phenomenon?

A mental process?

[Chalks] Natural? YES
[cfm] Think? NO

Is agriculture part of this?

rm? in a way YES

A weather condition?

[Chalks] Meteo? YES

Raining cats and dogs?

Datsun cogs, old ladies and sticks etc.

[Rosie] Precipitation? - NO but chuckles and random clapping from audience

Cold enough to freeze the balls off a brass monkey?

[Phil] Chilly NO * audience chuckles and talks among themselves and some spontaneous clapping *

Something to do with climate change?

[Duj] Global warming? - NO * chattering and sporadic clapping in audience *

A Weather Forecast?

[Phil] Wet seaweed? - NO * audience murmuring and sporadic clapping *

Is the weather condition adverse?

[Rosie] Adverse? - YES. * audience getting excited *

The Shipping Forecast?

Does H2O (or lack of same) feature?

[Chalks] Forth, Tyne etc? NO
[Duj] Wet n'dry? - YES! * audience getting excited *

The Biblical Flood?

Would Rosie's last comment be the antithesis of the AOTC?

Does the AOTC take the format, "X as a Y"?

Does the AOTC relate to measuring weather?

[Rosie] Noah? - NO
[Duj] Oposite? - in a way but probably NO< br> [Quen] Logic? - NO but close
[Chalks] Meteo? - NO
Clue time: 4 words 2 the same relating to weather.

As right as rain?

[Chalks] Wet, wet , wet? - NO * gasps of anticipation and clapping from audience *

As dry as dust?

Are the two identical words "the"?

Hot as hell?

[Raak] Dusty - NO
[Rosie] Definite article?NO
[cfm] Bong! Right on the money!

As hot as hell is on the card. Well it felt that way when I kicked this one off! I hand over the iced baton to cfm.

Now that's a surprise. I was pretty much lost during all of that that round.
Well then, let's try ANIMAL WITH ANIMAL AND ABSTRACT CONNECTIONS

Is the primary animal human?

[Chalky] I suppose that I should have asked "Does it have any supernatural associations?" rather than the vaguer "Supernatural?"

[Q] Human first and foremost? YES.

Richard the Lionheart?

Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse?

I'll behave next time ;)

Is the secondary animal canine?

Begins with P?

Me And You And A Dog Named Boo - Lobo?

[Quendalon] *confused face*?

[GL] Dickheart? NO
[Dujon] The end of the world as we know it? NO
[CdM] Woof? YES *audience is too awed to applaud*
[Tuj] Having the usual, I see? NO
[Chalky] That 70s sound? NO

Is the canine a specific, identified dog?

[CdM] Name that dog? After a bit of research (and also technically speaking), NO. But YES would not have been a bad answer. :-)

One man and his dog?

(Went to mow a meadow.)

Would Julius Caesar be pertinent to the AOTC?

Anubis?

[Chalky] Oops! That should have been aimed at Software.

fictional?

[GL] One plus one? NO
[Dujon] Roman rule? NO--at least not as far as I know or could identify from a Wikipedia search.
[Q] I want my mummy? NO
[Chalky] Storytime? NO

Is the human a specific, identified person?

Is this a well-known phrase or saying?

[CdM] Can I see some ID, please? YES
[Chalky] "It's like they say..."? NO

Is this person alive?

[Tuj] Still among us? YES

Showbiz connection?

[Software] You oughtta be in pictures? YES, but I fear this may lead you astray. *nods among the audience*

Famous for doing something rather than who he/she is?

[GL] Real life action hero? YES.

Human=male?

[Chalky] Dude? YES

Has this man been depicted in film(s) but not appeared there?

[Dujon] I don't have sufficient knowledge answer your question. But I will answer another. YES, this man has appeared in films.

The abstract connection? Is that the 'films' bit? Documentaries?

I don't think I have sufficient knowledge of man with dog appearing in films .. so may withdraw my participation. Hope others demonstrate a little more curiosity ...

[Chalky] That's a big [YES] Don't drop out. :-( You've made an important connection!

Steve Irwin?

[Software] Mass market wildlife expert? NO
Hint: It might help to probe a little more on the abstract connection...

One Man And His Dog?

[Raak] Sheepdog drama? NO But one man and his dogs? YES :-)

Actaeon, torn apart by his own hounds?

[Raak] Bloody mess? NO. Was there a film about that? :-)

Are these multiple dogs all presented as if they were the same fictional dog (e.g. like when Lassie was periodically re-cast)

Has Timmy fallen down the well, again?

Is this USA-centric?

[Projoy, GL] Lass-a-likes? NO
[Chalky] Red, white and blue? YES and NO. The human is American. The dogs, I believe, are ethnically German.

Is he an explorer?

Are the dogs Dalmatians?

[cfm] Film? I don't know, but I'd watch it if there was.

Christopher Plummer and the Hounds of Munich?

I am completely stumped!

[Chalky] Explorer? NO, not unless you are speaking metaphorically.
[Raak] Spot the AOTC? NO *audience applauds enthusiastically at this line of questioning*
[Phil] Von Trapped? NO. (hint: the human is not an actor, although he has appeared on TV and in film.)

Is there a succession of dogs, rather than a number of dogs at one time?

If that makes sense. I'm remembering when I chose the MGM lion and discovered there had been (I think) four of them.

[CdM] YES and NO. There was at least one well-known succession but there have also been multiple simultaneous dogs. (Is it just me, or does that sound kinda dirty?)

Are the dogs Alsations/German Shepherds?

Just for my own clarification purposes.

Is the abstract connection musical?

[Dujon] A/GSs? NO *audience still approves of this line of questioning*

(Also, it's just you.)

[CdM] Rhythm and rhyme and harmony? NO *audience applauds nonetheless*

cartoon/cgi dachshunds?

Clearly I haven't the foggiest what this is .. don't know why I'm bothering.

Or even dancing dogs?

Is the abstract connection artistic?

You did say we should pursue it...

Turner and Hooch?

[Chalky] Dancing cartoon dachshunds? NO *audience claps encouragingly*
[CdM] But is it art? YES *loud cheering*
[Phil] Tom Hanks? NO The AOTC only has a tangential connection to show biz.

To summarize, we are talking about a contemporary American artist (male) working with multiple dogs of a German breed that is not the shepherd or Dachsund. He has appeared on at least two famous American TV shows and in his own films. I will add that those appearances may not be the only connection to film. And I will apologize for choosing what appears to be an extremely obscure AOTC. My guess, however, is that many of you would recognize this man's (iconic, really) work, which is held in the permanent collections of major museums including the the Museum of Modern Art in New York and the Smithsonian. A quick scan of his biography informs me that his work has also been exhibited in London, Paris, Madrid, Amsterdam, Munich, Seoul and Singapore.

Pinschers?

[Projoy] Police pup? NO
And I think it's time I put an end to the misery of this round. Sorry I picked such tough one. The furry baton goes to the first person who grabs it. And for those who are interested, the AOTC is revealed here.

It's good to learn new stuff

[cfm] I feel sure the AOTC would have been solved at some point. We are also missing some of our more, shall we say - forensic? gameplayers.

Chalky I'll take the fresh baton, thanks. I did give up a turn a few weeks back.
And now for a puzzler that everyone will have heard of .. A N I M A L

Human?

[cfm] You are too hard on yourself! I had certainly heard of the AOTC and know the photographs. I think I ended up getting stuck on the film angle, even though you did warn us that it might be a red herring.

An individual, unique animal?

[cfm] I'd never heard of him, but one man's obvious being another man's obscure is part of the fun of life.

[Phil] An individual, unique animal? NO

*points quietly at CdM's question*

[CdM] Human? NO

A pet?

Alive?

[Dujon] A Pet? NO
[CdM] Alive? YES

Found in UK?

A mammal?

[Softers] In UK ? YES
[CFM] Mammal? NO

An arachnid?

An insect?

A duck?

[Dujon] Arachnid? Technically NO .. *applause*
[Rosie] ... Insect? YES *enthusiastic applause*
[Sir Bedevere] Duck? NO

Can it sting?

Does one generally enounter them as a swarm or infestation -- as opposed to a lone bug?

[Rosie] Sting? Not 'sting' exactly ...
[cfm] Swarm or infestation? YES *audience getting excited*

*chances it* Mosquitos?

Midges?

Does it belong to the order of Hymenoptera?

Please ignore that, Chalky. From personal experience I know only too well that some of them can indeed sting.

[cfm] Mosquitos? NO
[Rosie] Midges? NO
*ignores Dujon's question*

Locusts?

Do they fly?

ladybirds?

[Raak] Locusts? NO
[CdM] Do they fly? NO
[Softers] Ladybirds? NO

This can be solved within 20 questions if you look back to where the audience got a bit excited ...

Ants?

They're made of Formica.

[Rosie] Formica Ants? NO

Do they attack vegetation?

Fleas?

Is this a common parasite found on humans?

[Rosie] Attackers of veg? NO
[cfm] fleas? NO
[Dujon] Common parasite found on humans? YES - three quarters of your question is correct, the other quarter half correct! *audience senses a result*

Lice?

As soon as I typed the word I started scratching...

Bed bugs?

Tapeworms?

Being in humans rather than on them.

[CdM] Lice? NO
[Raak] Tapeworms? NO

But Software has it on the 21st question - the AOTC being Bed bugs.
*gingerly hands over an insecticide-sprayed baton*

Well I'm Blowed!

* Carefully accepts baton from Chalky wearing surgical gloves *

Twice in quick succession. Well, well!

Now what do we have here? Another ABSTRACT with ANIMAL, VEGETABLE and MINERAL connections.

* Scantily clad girl parades the answer card in front of the audience *

Pornography?

[Phil] *laughs*

A human idea or concept?

A fictional place?

Unique?

[Phil] DIY passtime? - NO
[Rosie] Man made? - YES
[GL] Fairy story? - NO
[Duj] Only one? - depends on pedantic interpretation but generally NO

Humans with a common purpose?

[Rosie] Mass conciseness? - NO (although may be disputed when the AOTC is revealed, perhaps)

Are there animal connections other than human?

Is this an idea, political or social, say?

[cfm] Bestial - NO (although some may dispute this)
[Rosie] Conceptual? - YES

Anarcho-syndicalism?

[GL] Direct Action - NO (I had to look that up so no chance of it being the AOTC!)

Anything to do with economics?

Does it begin with P?

Is it a sandwich?

[Rosie] Money, money money? - NO * a few claps from the audience and some chattering *
[CdM] P-ish - NO
[Chalks] Cheese and tomato on brown? - NO

Virgin Trains?

[Rosie] West coast delays? - NO I suppose they could be described as abstract * chuckles from audience *

Is this a symbol of something (e.g. a coat of arms or a flag)?

[Duj] Symbolic? - NO

Is it a place?

A whole week and very little interest in this one ..

Is it a well-known phrase or saying?

Is it connected to the arts?

Multi-Chalks: Place? - NO; Saw? - NO * stiring in audience * ; Arty-farty? - NO (only indirectly but that could be misleading)

A political theory?

[Rosie]Dogma? - NO

A personal philosophy or way of living?

[cfm] karma? - NO

Something to do with language?

[cfm] Chatter? - NO

Conneted to religion?

[GL] Belief? - NO

A scientific theory or hypethesis?

[Rosie] Good science? - NO

Is this a physical 'thing'?

[Duj] Physical? - NO this is an abstract concept that like many such has a physical side effect but the AOTC (3 words by the way) will make this clear

Bored to death?

Anything to do with fear?

[Chalks] Ennui? - NO maybe the participants are becoming that
[Rosie] Scary? - NO

Is this a relatively modern idea?

[Rosie] Newish? - YES end of 19 Century apparently

Anything to do with health matters?

Modern? Newish? End of 19th Century - that's 18 hundred and something! Did you just say YES so that it doesn't look as though everyone except Rosie has had a NO for the last fortnight? :-)

Anything to do with Trade Unionism?

(Chalky) 1899 is only yesterday. My Dad was alive.

[Chalks] Healthy? - NO not directly anyway- recent well not BC is it?
[Rosie] All out? - NO * some stirring in the audience *

Modern Olympic Games?

Health and Safety?

Is this a form of revolution?

[Chalks] 5 rings - NO
[Rosie] H&S Gestapo? - NO
[Duj] Uprising? - NO you are all drifting away from ABSTRACT.

CLUE: there is more than one of these

The real Chalky

Is it a Lifestyle Choice?

Softers - please can you do a summary to say what it's NOT. Ta :-)

[Chalks] My way? - NO anyone can do it, most do.

SUMMARY - Concentrate on the ABSTRACT. It is not: a fairy story, a life choice, a saying, a game, a passtime, scientific, religious or other social theory, nothing to do with language, politics philosophy or art. ANIMAL connection is strong the others less so. Good luck, it ain't that hard!

Is it culture-specific?

[CdM] Foible? - YES - well to qualify, the AOTC is AFIK but the principle isn't

Associated primarily with the UK?

[CdM] Blighty? - YES, primarily, the AOTC is anyway.

Is it an activity, i.e. something that one does?

[Phil] Out and about? - YES and NO, perhaps is the best answer.

Is the AOTC a present participle?

as "yes and no" isn't a very useful answer :)

[Phil] Grammatical? NO The AOTC has 3 words none of which are the definite or indefinite article. Hint: When the question was set it was in the future, now it is in the past.

Does the AOTC define/describe a period of time?

The August Bank Holiday Weekend?

[Phil] Time slot? - YES
[GL] August Bank Holiday - YES!

Hurrah! * hands over Brighton rock shaped sticky baton to GL at last *

Well, that took a pointlessly long time. So, a simple ANIMAL this time.

Is it human?

[Software] were the mineral and vegetable connections the bank?

[Phil] - Human? YES have a baton. (I said it was easy)

Hahaha! Why thank you, GL!
OK, so the next one is

ANIMAL & VEGETABLE

Is the vegetable wood?

Food or drink?

[GL] Wood? NO
[Raak] Food/Drink? YES *Some early applause*

A falling out between you and Rosie?

[Dujon] Me and the old geezer coming to blows? NO!

Hidden text

I'd love to know who's the vegetable...actually, maybe I wouldn't :-)

Meat and two veg?

Is it a sandwich?

[Raak] Meat+2Veg? NO
[Chalky] Sarnie? NO

Pork scratchings?

Does it need to be cooked?

[Software] Scratchings? NO
[Rosie] Need to be cooked? NO (although a perverse minuscule part of me wants to say YES)

Is the vegetable to be found in a greengrocer's?

I decline to answer your previous question (hidden) on the ground that ... ;)

[Dujon] Greengrocer's vegetable? NO

Is it an animal product?

Is the animal fish?

[Chalky] Animal product? YES *a little applause*
[GL] Fish? NO

A traditional British sausage (50% breadcrumbs)?

Is dairy produce involved?

[Raak] A banger? NO
[GL] Dairy involved? YES *some more applause*

A pizza?

Does the AOTC include a reference to a U.K. country?

Is cheese the animal element?

[Rosie] Pizza? NO
[Dujon] UK reference? NO
[Chalky] and cheesey? NO

Is it sweet rather than savoury?

[CdM] Sweet? The AOTC is not sweet.

Is yoghurt involved?

[GL] Yoghurt? NO

Is the vegetable element made from grain?

[cfm] Grain? NO

Milk?

[Software] Milk? YES, milk is involved *applause*

Are cookies also involved?

[Raak] Cookie? NO

Is it in anyway responsible for bringing boys to the yard?

[GL/Kelis] Your milkshake? NO

Ambrosia Creamed Rice?

[Chalky] Devon knows how they make it so creamy? NO

Is it casein?

[Software] Casein? NO

A comment

Rosie's question "Does it need to be cooked?" continues to weigh on my mind. No Anglophone would say that they cook the Answer on the Card, but cooking of some sort or other is involved in the process of turning naturally occurring ingredients into the AOTC.

Is it a salad of some sort?

Weirdly enough .. the cooking thing .. was the one reply which has completely thrown my train of thought ...

A biscuit of some kind?

[Chalky] Salady? NO
[Rosie] Biscuity? NO

Butter?

Custard?

[Chalky] Butter? NO
[GL] Custard? NO

OH NO !!!!!

I've just reviewed my answers and noticed that when Chalky asked "Is it an animal product", I said "YES". I should specify that only the animal part is an animal product, the vegetable part isn't. Hope that helps ! :-)

PANIC OVER!!!

[Phil] Fret ye not - that's what I meant.
In summary: The AOTC is 'Animal Product' plus a 'Vegetable' (but not a vegetable to be found in a greengrocer) somehow linked together. Edible/Potable. Doesn't need to be cooked. Milk is involved.
I'll now ask a question, if I may ...

Is there an alcoholic content to this?

[Chalky] Alcoholic? NO

A bit more summary

One would not "cook" the AOTC but some form of "cooking" is involved at some point in creating the AOTC from naturally occurring ingredients.

Is yeast involved?

[Phil] Thanks - I was thinking fermentation - hence the alcohol question.

[Chalky] Yeast? NO

Sour cream and chive flavoured crisps?

A hint...

A follow-up to the 2nd question asked (Rosie's first) would be useful.

Drink?

[Chalky] Drink? YES *relieved applause*

A skinny latte or somesuchlike?

[Chalky] A latte? CORRECT. Congratulations! Now does my dithering over "cooked" make sense? Anyway, have this tax-avoiding baton...

Thanks Phil - we managed to sort that one out between ourselves :)
*raises a tasse of full fatte latte*

Staying with the Keep It Simple agenda - here's a lively little A N I M A L

Human?

[Rosie] Human? YES

Is/was this person short in stature?

[Dujon] Is/was this person short in stature? YES

Napoleon?

[Software] Napoleon? NO

Is this person alive?

[Software] Napoleon wasn't short, apparently, he was just portrayed as short for propaganda purposes. A bit of googling, and my suspicions are confirmed. He was about 5'7" (1.70m), over 2 inches taller than average for France at the time, and just about exactly average for the UK. Reference here

[Phil] Is this person alive? YES
re. Boney - grossly misrepresented ... poor sod.

An entertainer?

Does this person have a name consisting of two identical syllables?

[Rosie] An entertainer? NO
[Dujon] A name consisting of two identical syllables? NO

Nicolas Sarkozy?

keeping with the French theme ...

There's a French theme..???

[Software] Nicolas Sarkozy? NON

Sandy Toksvig?

(Appolgies for the spelling I don't have time to check it.)

[GL] Sandy Toksvig? NO

John Bercow?

[Rosie] John Bercow? NO

This is supposed to be a nice easy quick one - random guesses of allegedly vertically-challenged individuals will lead nowhere .. and I'm already bored

Male?

British?

Under 35?

3 yesses!

[Rosie] Male? YES
[Software] British? YES
[Gusset Login] Under 35? YES

Is he a 'child prodigy'?

[Dujon] Child prodigy? Not exactly a prodigy ..*huge cheer from audience*

George, prince of cambridge?

YES - the very chap! HRH George, Prince of Cambridge.
*Hands silver-spoon shaped baton to Gusset Login*

Thank you. I guess he is a little short for a stormtrooper.

OK. This one is a MINERAL with possible abstract and animal connections.

Is this a unique object?

Metallic?

Manufactured?

[Phil] Unique? YES
[Software] Metal? NO
[Rosie] Manufactured? Um... it is man-made, if that's what you mean, but not mass produced, obviously.

A monument or statue?

[Software] Monument or Statue? YES. *Applause*

In England?

[Rosie] England? NO.

A well known male sans fig leaf?

[Dujon] A well known male without a fig leaf? As written, the answer has to be 'partly'. As intended, the answer would be very much NO. Take your pick.

Rodin's The Thinker?

[Software] The thinker? NO.

To clarify my answer to Dujon, the AOTC involves the image of a man who is not wearing a fig leaf but does not involve naked men in any way that I know of.

Is it a statue of just one person?

A political figure?

In Europe?

[Phil] A statue of just one person? The statue part of it is of one person.
[Rosie] A political figure? YES.
[Software] In Europe? NO.

In America?

[Gravy] 'Mer'ca? Yes

The Lincoln Monument?

Does the word Washington appear on the card?

[Dujon] Does Washington feature? NO
[Phil] Lincoln Monument/Memorial? YES. Have a baton purchased from the John Wilkes booth.

I have to give credit to the film "Night at the Museum 2" for raising my awareness of the Lincoln Monument, and more recently the 50th anniversary of the "I have a dream" speech, without which I would never have guessed that.
Anyway, onwards and upwards....our next AVMA is

Abstract with Animal

Is it a sandwich?

[Chalky] A sandwich? Alas, NO

Phrase or saying?

[Software] Phrase or saying? NO

One of the Seven Deadly Sins?

... or all of them?

[Chalky] A sin or seven? NO

A fictional person?

Grand Theft Auto V?

[GL] A fictional person? On this occasion I'll be generous and allow you the two questions in one - YES and NO
[Chalky] GTA V? NO

A fictional animal?

[Chalky] Fictional animal? YES *some applause*

A mermaid?

skippy?

A named individual fictional animal?

[Software] Mermaid? NO
[GL] Skippy? NO
[Raak] Named individual fictional animal? YES *a little more applause*

Created by A.A.Milne?

Has this named fictional animal appeared in more than one of the following media: book, film, TV, radio, grand opera?

[Dujon] A.A.Milne? NO
[CdM] In more than one of: book. film, TV, radio, grand opera? YES

A Disney character?

[Lovely Gravy] Disney? NO

Human?

Nobody has checked this yet.

Dog?

[Software] Actually, I did.

Was the creator male?

[Software] Human? NO (yes to fictional animal, no to fictional person, hence not a person. You are correct that nobody asked that question directly though)
[GL] Dog? YES *more applause*
[Dujon] Male creator? YES

Any connection with the Simpsons?

[Lovely G] Connection with the Simpsons? YES, but not an important connection, IMHO.

Greyfriar's Bobby?

Did this character first appear in print?

Did they first appear on TV?

[Software] Greyfriar's Bobby? NO
[Dujon] First appearance in print? YES
[GL] First appearance on TV? NO (see above)

Lassie?

[Ye Olde Softeware] Lassie? NO

Was s/he introduced in a childrens' story?

[Dujon] In a children's story? NO

Astonised of Berkshire

Ooops, not sure what happened there, but I thought I'd add a summary, just to help out, as I thought this would be simple. Not that there's much to summarize.
This is a fictional dog; created by a man; has appeared in multiple media (from the list: book, film, tv, radio, Grand Opera), but first appeared in print; has a slight link to The Simpsons (which is unlikely to be useful).
The AOTC was not created by A.A.Milne; is not a Disney character; is neither Greyfriars Bobby nor Lassie; was not introduced in a children's story.

The hound of the baskervilles?

[GL] HotB? NO

Toto

[Chalky] Toto? NONO

Created by Homer?

[Dujon] A Homeric character? NO

A clue

An assumption appears to have been made.

Is it a cartoon dog?

.. such as Scooby Doo?

[Chalky] A cartoon dog? YES *Much applause*
[Ibid.] Scooby Doo? NO *oohs, aahs and groans of disappointment*

Snoopy?

and the Red Baron

[Software] Snoopy? YES!
My childhood hero. I still drink out of a Snoopy mug at work, which even has a Snoopy stand to sit on. Such is my fondness for the special beagle, that when I tried this AVMA on family members, and as soon as I said "fictional dog", they guessed it. The assumption, of course, was that "print" referred to books. Also, The Simpsons makes several nods in the direction of Peanuts and Snoopy - e.g. "Hungry, Hungry Homer" which was on C4 last week finds Homer asleep on top of the kennel, and Bart says "Good grief!" more here.
Here, Software, take this flying helmet, goggles and scarf set - may it serve you well!

Well, well. I'm getting too good at this.

Can I think of something that won't cause as much trouble as last time?

Let's try this, then:

MINERAL with ANIMAL and Vegetable connections.

Sorry Software - too complicated - only kidding.
But whilst we're about it, PLEASE answer the questions in a straightforward manner ... takes bloody ages to work out what you're trying to reply to usually! ;-)

:o(

Sorry, sorry, sorry ...

A building?

Margarine?

A planet?

Man-made?

[Raak] A building? - NO (not as such)
[Phil] Margarine? - NO can tell talk from mutter
[GL] A planet - NO * some discussion and shuffling among the andience *
[Rosie] Man made? - YES

A satellite?

An international project?

[Phil] Satellite? - YES
[Duj] International? - YES

The ISS?

[Raak} ISS? - YES!

Please accept this SpaceX shaped baton

The next is, nowdays, mostly MINERAL.

man made?

Yes, man made

Is it something that was previously made from wood?

Ex-wood? No.

Concrete?

[Software] *amusement in the audience* Not concrete.

Made of plastic?

< Toaster < ?

[Rosie] Not really made of plastic, as ordinary people use the word, but an industrial chemist might disagree.
[Software} Bigger than a toaster.

Does it have moving parts?

[LG] *more amusement* It certainly does.

Is it elastic?

Something to support or suspend a human?

[Phil] Not elastic.
[Dujon] Yes! It supports or suspends a human. That might give slightly the wrong idea, but it definitely does that.

Might this be found in a fairground?

[LG] Not in a fairground.

Float on water?

[Software] About as well as a dog walks on its hind legs.

Is it primarily a form of transportation?

Some form of seating?

[LG] *applause* It is a form of transportation.
[Rosie] Not a form of seating.

Is it a form of footwear?

[Phil] Not footwear.

Does it have two wheels?

Swing bridge?

[LG] Does not have two wheels.
[Software] Not a swing bridge.

Is it "traditional" such as a rickshaw?

[Rosie] Not traditional.

Does it have wheels?

[Phil] No wheels at all.

Is the 'transportation' generally vertical?

[Dujon] Exclusively vertical, as in a lift? No.

Bobsleigh?

[GL] Not a bobsleigh.

Does on stand on it?

Might this be found at an airport?

[Phil] Interpreting the preposition strictly, one does not stand on this.
[LG] Not primarily found at airports.

Hang glider?

Is it a form of airborne transport?

[GL] Not a hang glider.
[Phil] *applause* Yes! A form of airborne transport.

Parachute?

Is heated air an important part of its propulsion?

[GL] Not a parachute.
[Dujon] *cheering* Yes! Heated air! Therefore it is...?

a political campain?

A hot-air balloon?

(GL) I can see your point, but it's Mineral. :-)

[GL] Not a political campaign.
[Rosie] A hot air balloon! Hold this mooring cable for a moment, will you? Oops...don't let go!

Oh shoot!

I was thinking hot-air balloon when I asked my last question, but didn't want to make the leap of faith. Congrats, Rosie.

Moving parts? Where exactly?

Also, did not get the 'dog on hind legs' reference to its ability to float on water. Surely an inflated balloon would float very well.

[LG] The whole thing moves! The gondola wouldn't float very well, and once the water puts the fire out, neither will the balloon.

Yay! Let's hear it for Charles' Law.

OK, this next one is

ABSTRACT with ANIMAL CONNECTIONS

Are the animal connections of a human nature?

(Phil) Human? Just about, i.e. YES

Phrase or saying?

(Softers) Not a phrase or saying.

Is the abstract a human behaviour?

(Duj) Not a human beviour.

Is there a connection to football?

Or is there a connection to the Tory Party?

Is it an institution or organisation type thing?

(CdM) It would take a conspiracy theorist of a high order to connect this with either of your suggestions.
(Phil) Strictly no, but possibly in a figurative sense.

Fictional?

Is there a misical connection?

Sorry, musical

(LG) Essentially no musical connection.

Fictional human(ish)?

(Softers) No. Real humans.

Is it a system of government?

(GL) Not a form of government. *slight amusement in the audience*

If not strictly an organisation, is it an informal collective of individuals?

(LG) Rather the opposite of informal.

OK then, a formal collective of individuals?

(Phil) Not a collective.
A different tack is needed.

Related to media?

(cfm) Media-related? YES.

A business cabal of some kind?

(Dujon) Not a business cabal.

Related to the news?

(GL) Not connected with the news.

Related to entertainment?

A spin doctor?

(cfm) Related to entertainment? YES.
(Softers) Spin doctors? The very last thing need by the AOTC. So, er, NO.

Are sattelites involved?

(Dujon) No satellites, natural or otherwise.

Related to prestidigitation?

Specifically related to television?

(Softers) No sleight of hand involved.
(cfm) Telly? YES. *applause*

An announcer?

(Softers) No, not an announcer, not even the mellifluous Charlotte Green. :-(

"Reality" television?

(cfm) Not "reality" television.

Is it the name of a TV programme?

(Lovely Gravy) The name of a TV programme? YES. *audience animation*

Surely not Paxman?

(Software) Paxman? He is certainly involved.

University Challenge?

(CdM) Morniverse - JOHN! Of course it is. Well done. I hand you the furry animal. And it's goodnightfrommegoodnight.

Yes, well, that wasn't quite a lurker's victory, since I did ask questions earlier on, but I clearly stood on the shoulders of slightly-taller-than-average people, there.

This isVEGETABLE with ABSTRACT and ANIMAL connections.

A leek?

Edible?

Leek? No.
Edible? No.

The True Cross?

Paxman?

True Cross? No. *tiny smattering of applause*
Paxman? No.

An artefact?

Is it a cauliflower with aspirations to become a moose?

Is it made of wood?

Artifact? No.
Upwardly-mobile cauliflower? No.
Wooden? Yes.

Is the abstract a religious matter?

Abstract = religious? Yes. *applause*

Is the religion Christianity?

A crucifix?

Christianity? No.
Crucifix? No.

Native American?

Native American? No.

In a round about way could the animal portion involve bats?

Bats? Er. As far as I know it would have to be very roundabout.

Used in the course of prayer?

The use-mention distinction

Used in prayer? No (though I am not sure if it is ever mentioned in the course of prayer; I suppose it might be).

Is the animal connection human?

Just to prevent misplaced assumptions

Is the religion Roman Catholic?

Roman Catholic? No. (We already knew it is not Christianity)

Is it made in the form of the animal connection?

Oops, missed Phil's question.
Animal connection = human? The main animal connection is human, yes. (There are also many other less direct animal connections, both human and nonhuman.)
Made in the form of the animal connection? No.

Would this be most likely to have been constructed in Russia?

Could this be lifted by a person of average proportions?

Sorry, missed the Christianity bit.

Constructed in Russia? No.
Liftable? No.

Does it relate to a specific religion?

Specific religion? Yes.

Is the religion Buddhism?

Let's home in a bit

Buddhism? Yes. *applause*

A temple?

The Bodhi Tree?

Is it carved?

Getting right to the point

The Bodhi tree? Yes! *takes chainsaw, fells tree, and fashions baton for Chalky*

Oooops

A genuine Lurker's Victory - thanks to all who set up my re-entry to this game.

A N I M A L

Dame Shirley Williams?

[Gusset Login] Dame Shirley Williams? Inspired - but NO.

Well, Dame Shirley bleed'n Porter, then?

Sorry for not taking this too seriously at the moment. Things will improve.

Is the animal human?

[Rosie] Well, Dame Shirley bleed'n Porter, then? Eff'n NO.
[Basics] Is the animal human? YES

Is the human alive?

[Phil] Is the human alive? YES

Is this a female?

A politician?

Is this person's native language English?

.. thought I'd replied already

And again ..
[LG] Female? Might be.
[Rosie] Politician? Might be.
[CdM] Native language English? Might be.

Is this one specific person?

Is it a group of people with a common goal (e.g. a choir or a football team)?

[Phil] One specific person? Most likely - so YES.
[Dujon] Group of people? Most unlikely - so NO.

Culture specific?

[CdM] Culture specific? Not sure what you mean - culture is a big word. I'd say NO.

A particular role or post?

[Software] Particular role/post? This person certainly has a role/part to play so a tentative Yes.

At the moment you are reading this, is the AOTC a single identifiable individual?

[CdM] Single identifiable individual? Well spotted - NO.
.. but I still think the additional word ABSTRACT would have been misleading. You may disagree .. :)

Does the person who represents the AOTC know that they are the AOTC?

Sorry - been out and about and away from t'interwebs ...

[Phil] Does the person who represents the AOTC know that they are the AOTC? Not a scooby doo - NO

Is the person a creation of one's imagination?

Is the AOTC a different person for each one of us?

[Rosie] Is the person a creation of ones imagination? NO
[CdM] Is the AOTC a different person for each one of us? NO

An actor?

Does this person perform a service?

[Software] An actor? Unlikely but can't say for sure.
[Rosie] Perform a service? Insomuch as they are the subject of this puzzle - I have to say yes.

Have you met someone who is an AOTC?

[CdM] Have I met someone who is an AOTC? This particular someone is the only one who *could* be the AOTC. Whether or not I've met them already is irrelevant.

Will the AOTC be selected at birth?

[GL] Will the AOTC be selected at birth? NO .. what an odd question!

Is the AOTC the person who is the AOTC?

If so, it's Not Fair.

[Rosie] Is the AOTC the person who is the AOTC? NO - but I like your thinking! *Audience senses a breakthrough*

CdM?*

*(being the winner of this round)

I think that counts as a win, Monsieur C de M.
The actual Words On The Card are The Person Who Guesses That They Are The Winner Of This Round.
I toyed with the notion of adding ABSTRACT to the description but really couldn't be bothered with the standard questioning that might've come my way ;-)

Besides - you ARE a real person, aren't you?

*baton fashions itself into CdM-shape and flies to Daddy*

Interestingly, though Rosie's answer was not the answer on the card, it was a correct answer.
ANIMAL

Indeed it was.

Human?

[Chalky] Congrats on your delightfully bewildering round - that was fun!

Dame Shirley Williams?

Human?

(CdM) I'm flattered, despite the logical impasse. Not to worry - all statements made by ethnic-Welsh Londoners are false anyway.

Human? Yes. *some audience murmuring, which abates when they read the footnotes on the card*
Shirley Williams? No.
Human? Yes. *no murmuring, because the audience members have read the footnotes on the card*

Human with footnotes?

An armless pianist?

Human with footnotes? Yes. Your point? (OK. I think the most useful answer is yes. But it is possible to claim that a simple Yes is misleading.)
Handicapped pianist? No.

Is this a named human?

Is this more than one human?

Is this less than one human?

Good questions

Named human? No.
More than one human? The AOTC is not more than one human. *smattering of applause, nonetheless*
Less than one human? Yes. *some applause, and some discussion among the more pedantic audience members*

A severed head?

Severed head? No.

A diminutive human?

Small person? No. ("Less than a human", Software??)

blood?

Only human?

pre-birth?

Part of a specific human?

Blood? No.
Only human? This is where the footnotes come in. I am thinking of the AOTC in a sense specific to humans, but it can apply to other animals as well. You will almost certainly find it more helpful just to think about humans, though.
Pre-birth? No.
Part of a human? Yes. Part of a specific human? No.

A limb?

Limb? No.

An organ?

I nearly asked "Nigel Farage?" given the "Less than a human" answer :-)

Alive?

An organ? No.
Alive? No. *a little audience muttering*

Anything to do with medical research (stem cells etc)?

A cadaver?

Fingernails?

A beard or whiskers?

Medical research? No.
Cadaver? No.
Fingernails? No.
Beard/whiskers? Not the AOTC, but *massive applause*

A mustache?

A moustache? Yes! I am currently growing one as part of Movember (one of the founders of which is an alumni of the school where I now teach). I haven't had a moustache (without beard) since I was about 18, I think—and, if I do say so myself, I think it looks absolutely hideous. So if you feel like throwing support towards my Movember team, you can click here. It is a worthwhile cause.
*plucks out hairs one by one* and weaves them into a baton for cfm*

*ow!ow!ow!ow!ow!ow!ow!ow!ow!ow!ow!ow!ow!ow!ow!ow!ow!ow!ow!ow!ow!ow!ow!

Sorrysorrysorry

Alumnus. As you were.

*clicks*
*is positively crushed to find no photo of moustachioed CdM*
*donates*
Okay, this next one is ABSTRACT WITH ANIMAL ASSOCIATIONS

The idea of CdM with a moustache?

[Raak] *laughs* but NO :-)

A dog's life?

[cfm] Thank you. For a sufficiently large donation I will send you a photograph of someone with a moustache that, for all you know, could be me.

A fictional human?

[CdM] Er...not that crushed. :-)
Familiar phrase featuring pups? NO.
[GL] NO. The AOTC is abstract. I think that is the proper answer to your question...

Would many people consider the abstract to be a form of art?

Is the abstract associated with animal behaviour?

A well-known phrase or saying?

[Dujon] Art for the masses? NO
[Rosie] Oh, behave!? YES
[Chalky] Famous expression? NO

Is this behaviour regarded as a good thing?

[Rosie] Well-behaved? YES and NO. There a number of animal behaviors associated with the AOTC. Some are good, some are not.

The mating season?

[Rosie] Fun and games? NO. *a few murmurs from the audience*

A form of 'showing off'?

[Dujon] Theatricality? YES. There is an element of theatricality associated with the behavior that is associated with the AOTC. (Reminding everyone that the behavior is not the AOTC.)

Acting the fool?

[Software] Fool me once? NO

Is fear involved?

A song?

[Rosie] Scary stuff? YES, in some instances. But many other emotions might also be associated.
[Chalky] A musical solution? NO. But come to think, there is a movie title closely related to the AOTC...FWIW. :-)

A board contest?

[Dujon] Board contest? Not sure what you mean. A board game like Monopoly? NO. A skate boarding contest? NO. Opposition to someone's nomination to a Board of Directors? NO. Or did you mean something else?

Is the AOTC a result or consequence of the associated behaviors we've been discussing?

[Chalky] A result of the behaviors? YES *audience applauds vigorously*

Is the AOTC a performance?

[Phil] Showtime? NO. Not in the traditional sense. But metaphorically speaking, one could relate it to a finale. *audience applauds encouragingly*

Is there a connection to sleep?

[GL]Perchance to dream? NO

Is this an abstract 'thing' awarded as a result of a result?

Sorry for the earlier rather broad question.

[Dujon] An award? I think the best answer is NO, not in the traditional sense of honoring or gifting someone. But but but...*audience encourages this line of thinking with hoots and hollers*

Is this an accolade?

Peer pressure?

[Phil] Highest praise? NO.
[Rosie] Everybody's doing it? NO, that is not the AOTC. However, since peer pressure is frequently one of the behaviors that results in the AOTC...*audience continues to applaud*

Posting to Youtube?

The herd instinct?

[GL] YouPost? NO
[Rosie] Bovine behavior? NO

Dieting?

[Chalky] Losing it? NO.
Let's have a look at where we are.
The AOTC is not a behavior in and of itself. It is the result of more than one behavior. Though no one asked specifically, the AOTC is the result of human behavior. One of behaviors associated with the AOTC has an element of performance about it though it is not a performance in the traditional fine art or entertainment sense. If the behavior were a performance, however, the AOTC could be likened to the finale of same. Peer pressure is often involved. Though not an award per se, one or more of the behaviors associated with giving an an award are also associated with the AOTC. I will throw in for free that the AOTC is a noun.

Are the people engaging in these behaviours part of a specific profession?

[CdM] On the job? YES. Professional behavior is involved.*approving applause*

A degree?

[Chalky] It's academic? NO. But *applause* because that's a noun and the final result of a series of behaviors.

a job promotion?

[Chalky] Climbing the ladder? NO.

An ASBO?

Anything to do with sport?

[GL] An acronym I had to look up? NO.
[Rosie] Sportsman-like? NO. But there are winners and losers associated. *applause*

Is it generally a negative acheivement?

By which I mean, for example, the 'wooden spoon' in a sporting tournament.

[Lovely Gravy] Unhappy face? MAYBE. (See "there are winners and losers associated" above.)

Does the noun relate to marriage?

Does the abstract noun relate to death?

[Dujon] Love or marriage? NO.
[Chalky] Mortality? NO.

Does this occur in a particular geographical location?

Twenty-nine questions over twenty days might indicate scant interest in this little puzzler - even my curiousity meter is twitching around 'indifferent'.
So it's not connected to love, marriage, birth, death, academia, job development, sport or the performing arts - is not a well-known phrase or saying or an an 'award', per se?

Does it involve a voting procedure?

Is it connected to the medical profession?

Would this have been possible 30 years ago?

[Chalky] Particular geographical location? NO, it happens in many locations.
[Chalky 2] Involves voting? YES, often.
[Chalky 3] Medical connection? YES and NO. It is not a critical connection but some of the most famous examples include a medical connection.
[Chalky 4] Possible 30 years ago? YES. And also 300 years ago.
*vigorous applause for the somewhat indifferent player*

Is this a leadership matter?

I've given up.

I apologize. I guess I am really bad at this game. Next time i get the baton, I will just pass it on.
The AOTC is "verdict" -- in the legal sense, the finale of a trial, which involves some degree of performance on the part of both attorneys and witnesses...and which also involves voting, at least in my experience as a juror.

[cfm] Sorry you feel the need to apologise - there was nothing wrong with your choice really.
Something I've said before on more than one occasion ... I think it helps to reply to a question without changing the questioner's original wordage. Spinning a question forces a 'double read' which can get tiresome. It can also mislead, eg. your reply to CdM's key question regarding a specific profession didn't inspire a rigorous follow-up and perhaps should have?

[Chalky] Thank you for the advice.
*raises, then lets the baton fall once on the desk and leaves it for whomever*

[cfm] I've only been in the chair once. It can be quite difficult to respond to questions in a manner relative. Some people are quite adept at it. I wasn't. Don't dwell on it, regardless of the somewhat snide comments you might receive.

If no one else is taking it.

[cfm] Don't worry about it. I've made the same mistakes before, we all have.

To hurry things along I will pick up this discarded baton and offer an ABSTRACT with MINERAL & ANIMAL connections.

A work of art?

[cfm] Work of art? I would say Yes, but not everyone would agree.

A singular work (versus a category of same?)

20/21 century?

[cfm] A thing, not a type of thing? Yes.
[Software] After 1900? Yes.

A piece of visual art?

[cfm] Visual Art? I said before, not everyone would agree it was even art. That said, if it is art, it probably qualifies as visual art. (I am guided solely by Wikipedia in this matter, however).

Could it be regarded as a style?

A monument?

Made of metal?

[Rosie] A style? No.
[Dujon] Monumental? No. *Audience Mirth*
[cfm] Metalic? No.

Was the AOTC intended as a work of art?

[cfm] Intended as art? No, at least I doubt its creator(s) would have used that word at the time.

Oh dear. Should have asked, is the mineral association with something metallic?

[cfm] Metallic association? No.

Is it man-made?

Is it the name of a place?

[Phil] man-made? Yes.
[Chalky] name of a place? *Audience Applaudes* Part of the AOTC is the name of a place.

Is the mineral connection water?

Can I go to a specific place to see it?

[Chalky] Wet Stuff? No.
[Phil] Can you see it in a specific place? Yes, I have seen it in several specific places.

Could it fit inside a microwave oven?

If it can be 'seen' is it Abstract?

[cfm] Could it fit inside a microwave oven? Yes, it's an abstract.
[Chalky] Is it really an Abstract? Yes.

To clarify the point, the contents/title of a book, film or TV programme would all be examples of abstracts that can be seen. (I'm not saying it's one of those but they still exist).

Well then, is it a film or TV program? (I don't know why I keep losing sight of the fact that this is an abstract!) :-)

[cfm] Film or TV? No.

Is it a logo?

An illusion of some kind?

[Chalky] logo? No.
[Rosie] A kind of magic? No.

Is there a musical connection?

Camelot?

[Chalky] Musical connection? Yes, music is involved to soem extent.
[Software] It's only a model? No.

Is it a play?

I said: IS IT A PLAY!?

Typical example of my stupidity - Software asks "Camelot?"
The reply comes back " It's only a model - No "
Result: I spend more time worrying about my failure to make a connection between these two posts than I do about the actual resolution of this puzzle. Thus confirming why I shouldn't be playing this game.

[Chalky] A Play? No.
Sorry, I've been preoccupied, my redundancy notice came through on Friday.

[GL] So sorry to hear that. I hope that another, better opportunity is just around the corner for you. (((((hug)))))

[cfm] Thanks, so do I. But now I've got my CV up to date etc. I'd welcome the distraction of getting the game back up and running.

So, in summary The AOTC is the name of a work for the second half of the twentieth century that contains both visual elements and music. It is not a play, film, or TV programme but more than one copy exists. The title itself contains the name of a place, which is the mineral connection. The animal connection remains unexplored.

Is the animal connection human?

[GL] Eek. Just spotted your redundancy posting. Been there, done that. Hope something turns up pronto.
[Chalky] I don't understand the Camelot/only a model connection either.

[Phil] Human connection? Yes, but not exclusively.
[Chalky/Phil] I'm sorry for the Camalot/Model thing, it was a reference to Monty Python's Holy Grail. Clearly I have seen it too recently. It was not a clue.

It's been two weeks

Is there anyone else still playing this?

A novel?

[Software] A novel? No

OK. Either I, Christmas, or a combination of the two seem to have killed this round/game. Whatever the reason, it would seem wise for me to step down and offer the baton to someone else.
The AOTC was The Secret of Monkey Island.

I will place this baton here for anyone to take.

I know I haven't played for ages, but I have an idea for a very straightforward and unsubtle one... MINERAL.

man made?

[GL] Manmade? YES

Made of metal?

[GL] I thought many times about your AVMA, but never thought of a video game. Not that I've heard of Monkey Island, though :)

Metallic? NO.

Wood?

Is it edible/potable?

Bigger than a bread box?

[Phil] I don't think anyone else thought of video games either. Also, you should play Monkey Island.

Found in the home?

[Rosie] Wood? NO
[Chalky] Edible? NO
[GL] Smaller than a breadbox
[Software] Found in the home? YES is the best answer, albeit disputable.

Plastic?

Stone?

[Dujon] Plastic? NO
[GL] Stone? NO, I think.

Chalk?

[Chalky] u-y=aotc? NO.

Oil?

Liquid at room temperature?

A ceramic material?

[Rosie] Oil? NO
[GL] Liquid? NO
[Chalky] Ceramic? YES

Some form of crockery?

[Rosie] Plates etc.? NO

Something deliberately artistic?

A Garden Gnome?

[Phil] Very seldom considered art
[GL] GG? NO

A gentlemen's urinal?

Associated with a particular culture?

Is it used as an insulator?

[Rosie] Fountain? NO (but you are on the right track - that is if you really know your contemporary art very well!)
[CdM] Culturally specific? NO
[Dujon] Insulator? YES, I think you could say that.

Any connection with Le Mannequin Pis?

Long shot. Yes, it's bronze and older even than me, but my knowledge of contemporary art is not so much like the back of my hand as the sole of my foot.

[Rosie] P-boy? NO (getting colder)

Does water run through it?

[Rosie] Google "Duchamp's Fountain", of which I've been aware for about a week, by pure chance.

[Phil] Water through it? *audience guffaws* Hopefully not!

(Advice to most: don't bother with the contemporary art angle unless you've been paying very close attention since the end of Duchamp's era)

Is it functional, i.e. was it created to serve a particular purpose?

A swimming pool?

[Fil] Phunctional? YES
[Rosie] Pool? NO.

Is it designed to prevent water flow in some way?

[Phil] Prevents water flow? YES

Is it made of Bakelite?

A ceramic tap valve?

A ceramic bath plug?

A bottle stopper (with or without rubber washer)?

(Phil) Yeah, ceramic Bakelite - good stuff.

[Phil] Not Bakelite
[Software] Tap valve? NO
[GL] Plug it? NO
[Rosie] Bottlestopper? NO

Is it bigger than a toaster?

[Rosie] You know, something felt wrong as I typed it. What was I thinking!?

A brick?

A roof tile?

*lobs baton through Raak's window, wrapped in a note reading: "Essential component of Carl Andre's Equivalent VIII? YES!"

I think that’s my first lurker’s victory. Next is MINERAL and ABSTRACT.

The atmosphere?

The oncoming storm?

[Rosie] No atmosphere, as Neil Armstrong said.
[GL] Outlook for Viking, Fisher, German Bight? No.

Phrase or saying involved?

Mineral in its natural state?

[Software] Not a phrase or saying.
[Rosie] Unnatural.

A man-made object with a significance beyond its immediate use?

[Rosie] Can you unpack that? The words on the card refer to a man-made object. They also refer to something abstract.

The Sword of Damocles?

Having carefully unpacked it from its vagina.

[Rosie] Not the Sword of Damocles, wherever it's been.

Is the object made mainly of paper?

[Rosie] Not paper.

Is this larger than a 'phone box?

[Dujon] Smaller than a phone box.

Is it smaller than an iron atom?

[GL] Bigger than an iron atom.

Is it metallic?

but is it art?

[Rosie] Not metallic.
[Phil] Not art.

Plastic?

Stone?

[Rosie] Not plastic.
[Software] *mutters of "At last!" from the audience* Um, stone, sort of.

a diamond in the rough?

[GL] Not a diamond.

Is this a grave matter?

Depiction of a human?

[Dujon] Not grave.
[Rosie] Not a graven image.

Concrete?

Used in building?

[Phil] Not concrete.
[Rosie] *some applause* Is used in building!

A pseudo-stone like Corian, for example?

[Software] Not a pseudo-stone. (I suspect a retired industrial chemist might inform us that the thing on the card isn't stone at all.)

A brick?

Glass?

I suspect GL has it.

[GL] *applause* GL very nearly has it, but it would be bad form for me to have just reused the previously set object. No, this is not a brick.
[Rosie] Not glass.

A breeze block?

[GL] Not a breeze block.

Mortar?

[Phil] Not mortar.

Another Brick In The Wall?

A chip off the old block?

[Chalky] Not Pink Floyd.
[Software] *murmurs in the audience* Not a chip.

A buttress?

female butter

[Rosie] Not a buttress.

Writer's block?

[Software] Not writer's block. *the audience drift off to sleep as the team wander into the fog*

The foundations?

[Rosie] Not foundations. Smaller than a phone box, folks.

Pebble-dashing?

With the abstract being the chundering euphemism.

[Phil] Projectile vomiting? No.

Some attention to the mineral aspect, and to the audience reactions, might be more fruitful.

Stone the crows?

[Software] Not corvicide.

Ceramic?

[Rosie] Yes, ceramic. *the audience open their eyes a crack, for hope springs eternal*

Down the toilet?

on the tiles?

[Software] Not a toilet.
[GL] Not a tile.

The Keystone?

[Chalky] Not a keystone.

Does the AOTC include the word 'stone' - compounded or otherwise?

[Dujon] No occurrence of "stone". A hint: it does have an occurrence of a significant word that has been guessed already.

Does the AOTC include the word 'brick'?

[GL] *applause* It does contain the work “brick”!

Drop a brick?

[Software] Not a dropped brick.

A brick ****house?

I love my brick!

A Few Bricks Short Of A Load?

[Projoy] Not a brick house.
[GL] Not a sex toy.
[Chalky] Not a few bricks short.
Hint: neither of the words on the card is "brick".

Decorative Brickwork?

Clutching at straws as I've ground to a mental block

[Phil] Not decorative brickwork.

Bricklayer's Arms?

[Projoy] Huge hands with no fingerprints? No.

Bricking It?

[Chalky] Not bricking it.
Hint: the words on the card are an indefinite article followed by a noun.

A brickbat?

[Projoy] At last! A brickbat! Have this bouquet tied to a hurled half-brick.

OK, this one is ABSTRACT (with mineral and vegetable connections)

A phrase or saying?

Bouquets and brickbats?

Anything to do with bricks?

[Raak] We've taught each other a new word each in the last 5 days :-)

[GL] Phrase/saying? NO
[Raak] Florid critiques? NO
[Phil] Brick-related? YES.

Does the AOTC contain 'brick'?

[Phil] =*"brick"*? NO

Does the Abstract convey a sense of strength?

[Rosie] Abstrong? NO

What about permanence, then?

Any building related terms in the AOTC?

[Rosie] Permanence? NO
[Software] Building-related? YES

Is there a music connection?

[Chalky] Music? NO.

Vegetable wood?

[Rosie] Wood could be involved but I had something else in mind as the veg connection.

Is there a "wall" connection?

[Phil] Walls? A connection, but not a crucial one.

Is it a place?

[Chalky] A place? NO

Is the mineral/vegetable connection paint?

Is it a building?

Is it related to roofs?

[Dujon] Paint? NO
[Chalky] Building? NO *applause*
[GL] Roofesque? YES, related.

Is it a collection of constructions?

[Chalky] Collection? NO

A Monument?

Remains of a building?

A Map?

[Chalky] Monumental? NO
[Phil] Ruin? NO
[Chalky] Cartograph? NO

A house of cards?

[Sw] House of cards? *some cynical laughter from audience* NO.

Is it a well-known phrase or idiom?

Just remembered it's Abstract!

Is a human construct?

[Phil] Gusset asked that question ^^^ up there. Apparently it's not.

[Chalky] So (s)he did. Oops!

[Chalky] Human Construct? YES.

The concept of being indoors?

[GL] Withinness? NO

To do with religion?

[Rosie] Secular.

Is the AOTC generally regarded as a good thing?

[Chalky] A Good Thing^TM? Probably more YES than NO, but it would depend on whom you asked and when you asked them.

Connected with the weather?

[Chalky] Weathery? NO.

Is it related to architecture?

[Phil] Architecture? YES, basically.

Is it a recognisable 'style' of architecture

Is it a blueprint?

[Chalky] Style? NO
[GL] Blueprint? NO

An Englishman's home?

[Software] Well known phrase or saying? NO :)

Is it linked to a specific individual building?

[CdM] An exclusive address? NO.

Is the mineral stone?

[Phil] Mineral stone? INTER ALIA.

Does this relate to a piece of literature?

[Chalky] Literary? Most likely mentioned in literature but not specifically famous for that.

Is it the name of a room?

[Chalky] Not the name of a room.

CLUE: A lot of people reading will have direct personal experience of this, and for those that do they will have spent a lot of time thinking about it.

Is it an activity?

A game?

[Phil] Activity? SORT OF, not exactly
[Chalky] A game? *audience laughter* NO.

Conveyancing?

A profession or occupation?

[Phil] Conveyancing? NO *some applause*
[Chalky] Not a profession.

Buying a house?

[Raak] Housebuying? NO *audience look pleased*

Selling a house?

Moving House?

still in the right area

[Raak] Selling? NO
[Chalky] Moving? NO.

Gazumping?

House-hunting?

is renting a house involved?

[Chalky] Gazumping? What a wonderful word. NO
[Chalky] Hunting? NO
[Raak] Renting involved? NO *applause* NO, not in the sense you probably mean.

Is 'demolition' part of this?

[Dujon] Demolish? NO! Well, hopefully not.

Speculative development?

still in the right area

[Raak] Build it and they will come? NO.

Does a word in the AOTC end with "-ing"

Does it involve building a building?

[Phil] Gerund? NO
[Raak] Involves building? NO. (Involves a building? YES).

A mortgage?

A survey?

A valuation?

Home Insurance?

the default option

[Rosie, Chalky] Not those, since...
[Raak] YES! A MORTGAGE. The mineral connection is bricks and mortar and the vegetable connections are paperwork and cash. * hands over the baton in exchange for Raak's promise to pay him for it once a month for the next thirty years *

Don't worry, the government will bail you out.

The next is MINERAL, with ABSTRACT connections.

Does it involve bricks?

[GL] No bricks.

A man-made structure?

[Rosie] Man-made.

Metallic?

[Software] Nonmetallic.

Made of stone?

[Rosie] Made of stone.

Stonehenge?

A building?

[irach] Not Stonehenge
[Projoy] Not a building.

Unique?

[Tuj] Unique.

Rosetta Stone?

In Britain?

Larger than a telephone box?

(Damn. I actually thought of mortgage when Projoy gave us his clue, but then rejected it for some really compelling reason that I can't remember.) :-)

[Rosie, CdM] Smaller than a telephone box in Britain, because...
[GL] The Rosetta Stone!

Hmmmm...

Let's go with an ABSTRACT with Animal connections.

Human animal?

[Software] human? - No.

Is the animal a type of animal (as opposed to an animal product, such as leather)?

A well-known phrase or saying?

[Phil] animal? - Not an animal product.
[Chalky] phrase or saying? - No.

Some sort of organisation?

A book/story?

the Animal connection - a living organism?

[Rosie] organisation? - No.
[Dujon] book/story? - Yes.
[Chalky] a living creature? - Yes.

A children's story?

Moby Dick?

Long shot.

[Phil] kids' tale? - Yes.
[Rosie] The great white whale? - No.

Does this animal have a tendency to sound like a clock?

[Dujon] Sounds like a clock? - No.

Is the typical/target readership under 8 years old?

[CdM] target readership<8? Why do you assume a story needs to be read?

Tom and Jerry?

Winnie the Pooh?

[Rosie] T&J? - No.
[Raa] A bear of very little brains? - No.

Has the story been filmed?

[Raak] on film? - Yes.

Babe?

Bambi?

[Chalky] Good Pig? - No.
[Software] Bambi? - No. *Some applause*

Did this involve some number of brooms?

Cartoon?

[Dujon] brooms? - I don't remember any.
[Chalky] cartoon? - No.

Disney?

[Chalky] Sidney? - No.

Peter Rabbit?

has the film been on release for longer than 10 years?

[Software] Peter Rabbit? - No.
[Chalky] film age>10 years? - Yes.

Old Yeller?

[cfm] Old Yeller? - No.

A dog?

[Chalky] Dog? - No.

a horse ... or maybe a kangaroo?

[Chalky] Horse/Kangaroo? - Not a horse. Not a kangaroo. Not some freaky cross-breed of the two.

You leave my black velvet coated skippy alone, Chalky. ;)

Does this film involve hunters?

[Dujon] hunters? - No, not that I recall anyway.

Mickey Mouse?

Bambi/Disney?

[Software] Mickey Mouse? - No.

Summary: The AOTC is a living, fictional, non-human character and the title of a live action film from more than ten years ago. The character is not a dog, horse, kangaroo or any traditional game animal (no hunters). It is not a book (I couldn't even find a novelisation) and the film was not made by Disney.

Why did Bambi get some applause from the audience?

King Kong?

Trigger, the Wonder Horse?

[Chalky] Bambi got the clap? - First time someone guessed a film with a title character.
[Chalky] King Kong? - No.
[Raak] Trigger? - Not a horse, not even Trigger.

Babe?

Racing Stripes?

[Software] Babe? - Still not Babe.
[Phil] Racing Stripes? - No.

A member of the cat family?

Is the AOTC humanoid?

[Raak] Feline? - No.
[Phil] Humanoid? - Yes.

a Martian?

[Raak] Martian? - *Audience applaudes loudly* No, or at least probably not.

Is the central character a being stranded on Earth?

Paul?

[Dujon] Stranded on Earth? - Yes.
[Phil] Paul? - No.

ET?

Superman?

[Phil] Kal-El? - No.
[Chalky] Phone home? - YES it was ET The Extraterrestrial. Have a baton with one glowing end.

Splendid! Thank you GL.

Keeping it simple with A N I M A L and V E G E T A B L E and even a hint of M I N E R A L

Meat and two veg with a sprinkling of salt?

[Raak] Meat and two veg with a sprinkling of salt? NO *audience applause*

Is it edible?

Smokey bacon crisps?

[Phil] Edible? YES
[Raak] Smokey bacon crisps? NO - but *a huge roar of approval from an already excited audience*

A full english breakfast?

Oh, I say ...

Thanks to some incisive questioning Projoy has it!
Full English Breakfast is indeed the AOTC.

Here you are, dear chap, please accept this amusingly-shaped sausage baton ... phnarr phnarr

How eggs-citing. Hopefully I won't make a hash of the next one.

MINERAL

Is it man made?

[GL] Human-made? YES.

Metal, mostly?

[Rosie] More metal than not? NO, but there is metal in it.

Intended to be digested?

Bricklike?

[Dj] Gustible? NO.
[Chalky] Bricky? NO.

[Rosie, addendum re: metal] I guess that by mass the metal makes up less than 50% but now I think about it more, I'm not completely sure.

Electrical?

A device, gadget, tool etc?

Yes or No to any - I'm not trying it on.

[Software] Electrical? I'd say NO * a murmur in the audience*
[Rosie] "Device" is probably the best out of those options.

A piece of equipment designed for the reception of radio signals?

[Dj] PoEDftRoRS? NO. *much audience applause*

battery operated?

A router?

A CD?

[Chalkeroonie] Battery? NO
[Rosie] Router? NO
[GL] CD? NO *tumultuous applause*

A cassette tape?

A DVD?

[rab] A cassette? YES!
* hands over a biro so you can rewind to the start of a new round*

Bollocks

I should know better than to post before buffering off to the pub for six hours.

Mine is ABSTRACT, potentially with connections to all three other categories.

The colour red?

[Chalky] Whence "phnarr phnarr", I wonder?

Reality?

Imagination?

music?

[Tuj] I first encountered it in the 80s via "Finbarr Saunders and his Double Entendres" in Viz magazine (once the 3rd most popular magazine in the UK!)

Colours - not even close.
Reality - only in the sense that this does have a physical manifestation.
Imagination - components might transpire as a figment of the same.
Music - no. But the general level of tangibility is not far off.

A human invention?

An artform?

As opposed to a specific piece of art.

Is this an emotion of some kind?

A performance of some kind?

(Tuj, Phil) I'm sure it was "Fnarr, fnarr".

April Fool?

Sorry for asking two questions but this one had to be asked.

Human? - very much so yes.
Artform? - to say yes would be deliberately obtuse, but the level of specificity is spot on.
Performance? - of some kind, I suppose so.
Ha ha bonk? - no

Is this an emotion of some kind?

On behalf of Dujon the Whisperer ;-)

Sorrow.

Emotional? No. Not that human.

Academia?

Lackademicals

No, but I like the cut of your jib.

Teaching?

A theory?

Teaching - no, but keep thinking about performances in the broader sense
A theory - no

Might this involve 'letters after ones name'?

Legal connection?

A medical connection?

Postnomials? Probably, but not necessarily.
Legal link? *applause* Yes, keep going
Medical? Possibly, but not necessarily.

Being called to the bar?

Mine's a small americano

Nope.

Evidence?

*ooh ahh* part of the performance certainly.

Cross-examination?

Making a statement?

A trial?

Prosecution?

Grumpy looks? No, but this is definitely involved.
Statement? Likewise
Inspiration for Kafka? audience oohs, aahs and generally inhales in a "that'll costya" kind of way no
Perspiration? No.

A tribunal?

Advocacy?

Tribunal? Not long, now.
Advocacy? Less abstract.

A court case?

Luggage? Nope. Keep going though.

Legal Aid?

The Supreme Court?

Unexciting fizzy drink? No
Cooked in stock and cream and served with rice to make an unfulfilling dish? Nein.
You were closest with the tribunal-style performance.

A Judgement?

A judicial review?

Public Inquiry?

A Royal Commission?

A verdict?

Got there in the end

Yay, Chalky. It was a public inquiry. Well done.

Yay. Nice one. Good to see you, rab.
As is my custom - a quickie ...
A N I M A L

Human?

[Raak] Human? YES - ish.

Politician?

Maria Miller?

An extinct hominid?

Sajid Javid?

Alive now?

[Gusset Login] - Politician? NO
[Software]- Maria Miller? NO
[Raak] - An extinct hominid? NO
[Projoy]- Sajid Javid? NO
[Rosie] - Alive now? n/a

A group of people?

A post or position?

To do with the military?

[Raak] A group of people? NO *a smattering of applause*
[Rosie] A post or position? NO
[Dujon] To do with the military? As much as 'it' is to do with any person or group of people.

*clarification* Without the indefinite article I assumed the one-word opening question was an adjective as opposed to a noun - hence my vague-ish reply.

Humanity? I.e. everyone?

[Raak] Humanity? NO - however, this relates to 'everyone'

A specific individual?

Part of a human?

The human genome?

[Projoy] Specific? NO
[Gusset Login] Part of a human? YES! *audience whooop whoops*
[Raak] The human genome? NO - although given my reply to GL above - more relevant than earlier guesses ;-)

An internal organ?

An organ?

Oops. I meant, a bone?

The bridge of the nose.

hehe

[GL] An internal organ? Arguably - YES, this is classified as an organ in most places [that classify such things].
[Projoy] YES an organ, still ... but definitely not a bone.
[rab] The bridge of the nose? NO - but *audience seems to like all the last few questions*

Is this (or these) particular 'empty' spaces within the human body?

The skin?

[Dujon] Empty spaces? NO
[Raak] The skin? NO

The blood?

Is it found at one specific location in the body?

The appendix?

[Raak] The blood? YES! Need a little more for the AOTC .. *roars of approval from a very excited audience*
[rab] Specific location? As confirmed above - several locations throughout the body.
[Phil] Appendix? Nah :)

The circulatory system?

[GL] Circulatory system? NO

The corpuscles?

[Raak] Corpuscles - NO - although they are relevant ..

Anything to do with the process of healing?

Red blood cells?

The immune system?

No to all - it's about Blood!

Blood BLOOD

Blood vessels?

A blood donation?

Seeing the word so often on the page, the voice in my head is now making it rhyme with "mood". mood ... blood ... food ... blood ... hood ... blood ... wood .. blood ...

Black pudding, then. So there.

[Software] I think Chalky said yes to "human?", so that would be quite some black pudding if it is right.

[Projoy] Not blood vessels
[Raak] Not a blood donation
[Software] Not a human black pudding.

Remember ... it's all about the blood.

blood plasma?

An armful (very nearly)?

Haemoglobin?

Is this a type of blood cell which has various types?

[Raak] Plasma? Not the AOTC
[Projoy] Not an armful
[Rosie] Haemoglobin? Not the AOTC
[Dujon] 'Various types' is a phrase which should lead to the AOTC ... *audience wakes up*

A rhesus negative?

What took you so long ..?

[Projoy] 'A rhesus negative' is about as close as anyone has come to the AOTC, with the exception of Raak who guessed the 'blood' word. As the AOTC is Rhesus Negative Blood I am thrilled to hand over this gargantuan syringe-shaped baton to do with as you wish ..

It may be just a smear to you, mate, but that's life or death to some poor blighter.

OK, here's another.

ANIMAL

Human?

[Rosie] Human? YES.

Alive?

A particular human?

[GL] Not alive.
[Phil] A particular human.

Died this year?

[GL] Mort MMXIV? NO

A pianist?

An actor?

Died this decade?

Involved in "the arts"?

... or even "the sciences"?

[Dujon] Pianist? NO.
[rab] Actor? YES.
[GL] Mort -10? NO.
[Phil] Arts? YES.
[Chalky] Science? NO.

Male?

British?

[Phil, Rosie] British and Male.

Has he starred in a major science fiction movie?

Died post 1990?

[Raak] SF movie? Pretty sure that's a NO.
[Chalky] Died after the Thatcher era? NO.

Died before 1970?

Died before the Heath era? YES.

Shakespearean roles?

Garrick?

Died before 1960?

#obsessingonthedeaththing

[Raak, Rosie] Not known for Shakespeare
[Chalky] Died since 1960.

Kenneth Horne?

Stan Laurel?

Vocalist?

[GL] Stiff Horne? NO.
[Phil] Resting Laurel? Another fine mess: NO.
[Software] If you mean singer, then NO.

Tony Hancock?

The lad himself

[Rosie] It IS Tony Hancock. Please take this radio aerial (and send a tray of bread pudding to Kuala Lumpur).

Part of my early teenage years. On the Home Service, no less, or was it the Light Programme? Can't remember. Now, what shall I do with this thing? Ah, yes -

ABSTRACT and MINERAL.

The Philosopher's Stone?

The last train?

Sonic Screwdriver?

A legendary object?

(Phil) Nothing so concrete.
(Projoy) Nice try, but alas....
(GL) No, not a latter-day Swiss Army penknife.
(Raak) YES, at least in the Abstract sense.

A particular vision?

(Dujon) YES, something specific.

Hidden text

I am now going to bed

Human-made?

(Projoy) NO, not a human creation though the Abstract indirectly involves humans.

Something that might be studied by scientists?

(Projoy) They might, as an incidental, but it's not the flavour of the AOTC.

Anything to do with steam engines?

(Raak) Vocal traction? Not a scintilla, not a smithereen, not e'een a wisp of steam from a leaky cylinder gland.

Is a lake often associated with this?

(Dujon) NO, nothing to do with lakes.

To do with "The Arts"?

A corno da tirarsi?

A brass instrument that Bach specifies in four of his cantatas, but no-one knows exactly what instrument he meant.

(Phil) Nothing to do with The Arts.
(Raak) Not a little trumpet.

Hidden text

(Welsh) corn bach

Metallic?

(Software) NO, not at all metallic.

A natural feature?

(GL) YES, a natural feature.

Giant's Causeway?

(GL) NO, nothing so hexagonal.

In the UK?

(Raak) Mineral - NO, Abstract - Mainly NO but could be.

Is the AOTC a mountain?

(Dujon) NO, not a mountain.

Are the abstract and mineral two distinct (essentially unconnected) meanings of the AOTC?

(CdM) The two are connected, one literal, one figurative.

Is this a weather feature?

(Chalky) Weather? Broadly, YES. *audience stops texting and looks up*

Does the word 'global' appear on the card?

(Dujon) "Global"? NO.

Is this a weather formation that was given a name?

Confused as always.

(Dujon) YES, it has a specific name but this is not normally regarded as a meteorological term.

Is this a form of wind pattern?

I know that I shouldn't but everyone else seems to have knocked off for the weekend.

(Dujon) NO, not a wind pattern.

Is it associated with deserts?

A dust storm?

(GL) Maybe a stronger asssociation with deserts than other places but a long way from exclusively so.
(Softers) Not a dust storm.

Is this 'object' a form of visual 'trickery'?

(Dujon) Visual trickery? NO, very real.

Associated with water or lack of?

(Chalky) Nothing to do with water, most certainly not.

Solar power?

(Chalky) YES, very much so. *audience goes positively orgasmic*

So is that the AOTC ...?

If it isn't I'm not quite sure where to go from here ..

Ra, the Sun God?

Apollo?

The sun?

(Chalky) NO, not the AOTC, but it's about the sun.
(Phil) NO, not Ra, not a God.
(Projoy) NO, not Apollo.
(Gusset Login) Yes, but specifically....?

halo?

Sunshine?

(Software) Not a halo.
(Projoy) The AOTC is much more specific.

A little ray of sunshine?

(Projoy) Rather more than that, it would seem.

A supernova?

A solar flare?

Solar winds?

(Raak, CdM, Projoy) Nothing as technical as these. An earthbound phenomenon, not a scientific term.

A sunbeam?

arrow_circle_down

Want to play? Online Crescenteering lives on at Discord