There is a proposition that Alperton to Mornington Crescent can be achieved in four moves. However proof has not been accepted for the existance of this number.
Oh, and considering that the (move=0) station is Alperton then the (move=1) station is not likely to be a doubling move either. If Beckton has been ruled out by Stanley-Smythe as reported, then that only leaves eleven possible stations by my reckoning - and Euston would seem highly improbable too. What d'you reckon folks ?
Valid point Artaud, initial formulas have found that we do require non-zero LV for the (move=1) station, and we will somehow need to equate these cofactors into the Fronsky calculations already mentioned by Blob. The analysis by Blob is showing that the next move in avoiding the Circle line has put a strong emphasis on 'allowance of linear movement' so I agree Euston is unwise. My own extrapolations suggest we should focus on either Leyton or Loughton thus avoiding divisibile cardinal notation.
I've had a cursory look at this and have found one flawed real-world solution and one ideal-world solution that only works in complex MC phase space. The Real solution is Alperton->Acton Town->Aldgate East->Moorgate->Mornington Crescent. The Imaginary solution is Alperton->Aldgate->Moorgate->Mornington Cresent. Unfortunately this is an odd-even move movement mapping which it is trivial to prove is irreconcilable. So you can cross that solution of your list as well. But this is only a first-pass approximation. It may be possible to use a one-move Expansion on the Imaginary at thereby unite the two. The trick, of course, is to do this without forcing a Real/Complex bifurcation.