[INJ] Nothing to do with a game.

I see my summary left out the information that this thing has a connection with time.

Aha!

[INJ] We have a winner! One bottomless bucket and a paintbrush handed over.

---

I didn't think anyone would object, given how long this one has been going.
Rather more quickly, I hope, you will get to:
Abstract with Animal Connections - (Actually I could claim it as Abstract with Animal connections on 2 counts and Animal with Abstract connections on 1 - but don't let that confuse you)

Won't be looking at this until tomorrow morning now, I'm afraid.

[Kim] Human? - NO
[Rosie] Activity? - NO

[Software] Expression? - NO

[Kim] Animal species exists today? - NO (however, I am just a little wary of the exact form in which the question was asked)

Is the animal mythical?

[Raak] Mythical animal? - Hmm - NO, unless you mean 'is it fictional?', in which case, the answer is YES

[CdM] Specific animal - YES
[G3] Common in Fantasy Literature? - NO

[Tuj] THE question? - NO
[Kim] booky animal? - NO

[CdM] From children's film? - NO (and he claims he doesn't speak American)

[Kim] Human Construction? - YES (in the sense that I think you mean)
Also YES in another sense *a few chuckles from the audience* and NO in a very obscure sense.
Confused enough now?

[G3] bred for some purpose? - NO
[Kim] Legend rather than myth? - NO - If anything the reverse, but neither is a good description

trying to hone in based on some previous answers...
And I never claimed any such thing. I speak American almost fluently.

[CdM] Member of real species? - YES

[CdM] "hone in"? **bang!!**

[Raak] ooops...

[Raak] Although... maybe I was just demonstrating my command of fluent American for INJ. According to the M-W Dictionary of English Usage

The phrase [hone in] seems to have become established in American English, and is apparently beginning to be used in British English (Garner has a British example). If you use it, you should be aware that some people will think you have made a mistake.

Not surprisingly, the folks at Language Log have have also discussed it quite a bit. One of the interesting things is that though the verb to home has been around a long time, home in and hone in are both recent coinages. None of which is meant as a serious defense in my particular case, by the way; had I noticed it, I would have certainly chosen home in in preference.

[Kim] Folklore? - NO