[Rosie] Drawing or painting? NO, but there is a connection to painting that might be misleading.

Artist's model? No.

A Muse? No.
I suspect you're all heading in the wrong direction, based on an incorrect assumption of what my careful use of the word "Animal" means.

Hand of God? NO

{Rosie] A part of the human body? YES *the last remaining audience member fetches the rest from the bar, and they all applaud excitedly*

Mm, only because they're all pissed.

[Rosie] Heart? NO

It seems to be just you and me. Where is everybody? Do they know something?

[Rosie] Involved in perception? NO (unless you include the sense of touch).
I think they're all too busy testing their nerdiness on MCiOS ;-)

[Phil] I'm madbusy atm.

Sorry if that sounds odd, but I'm trying to work out the logic of some of the earlier questions and answers.

[Projoy] Limb? NO *sharp intake of breath, and some applause*
[Dujon] A person's name on the card? NO

[Dujon] hothead? NO
Rosie's question of 30th August is worth paying attention to.

Hit the wrong key earlier.

[Rosie] A phrase or saying? NO, not really.
[Projoy] Appendage? According the dictionaries I've consulted, that's the same as a limb, in biological terms, so: NO

Not yours but ones.

[ROsie] "Your father's moustache"? NO, but getting towards the right lines. *some applause*

I haven't been ignoring this game; I've just been woefully short of inspiration.

[CdM] Joint? NO, not in any sense of the word.

[CdM] The moving finger? NO

[Irouléguy] Representational art? Ummmm....not really relevant as far as I can tell, as it's not drawing or painting.

[Rosie] A relative? NO

The words on the card, which are not a phrase or saying, and do not include a relative or the name of a person, can be taken in two ways:
The first is "Animal" in its nature, and is a part of the human body, although the human is not the same person for everyone, or even the same sex. The body part is not a limb, appendage or joint. It is reasonable to assume from the audience's lack of reaction that it is not a moustache, finger or hand.
The second is "Abstract" in nature, is art, is not painting or drawing. As such it is not "representational art", but could be said to be inspirational. There is, however, a connection to painting or drawing that is not implicitly mentioned on the card.

The body part is also not a heart, and not involved in perception, other than the fact that it has nerve ending, and therefore has the sense of touch. There are also plenty of incorrect guesses that I've brushed over in order to concentrate on what's important.