[Ig] Other part (the part that isn't human) a specific animal? YES
[Kim] You've slightly misread my response. I didn't say that there was a human part that was and wasn't a person. I said the whole thing was and wasn't a person. That said, the human part, as it happens might be described as being and not being a person. But the human part is not a character of myth. Glad to have cleared that up. :)
[Ink] Sandman/Tooth Fairy or generic substitute? NO
[rab] A something-man? In quite a broad sense, YES (but possibly not the one you're thinking of).

[Inkspot] Originated...particular culture... 2000 years ago? NO

[Kim] Word "man" on card? NO
[Inkspot] Mineral man made? YES

It's rather late to fess up to this, but I think there is probably a VEGETABLE element to this too (having said which, its absence hasn't really proven critical in the questioning as yet, nor probably will it).

[Ig] Warfare? NO *some laughter*

[Raak] Parts of persons? YES. One 'animal' is part of a person; the other 'animal' is partially a person.

[rab] Ghosties and ghoulies? NO

[Raak] Supernatural? NO

Handy summary: It's an ANIMAL, VEGETABLE, MINERAL, (ABSTRACT (ANIMAL)). On the card is a name - the name of something essentially fictional that is and isn't a person. One of the animal parts is part of a human, the other animal part is partially a person, and partially another specific animal. The mineral part is man-made. It isn't supernatural or mythical.

[rab] Mammal? YES

[Ig] Appeared first in a specific work... YES is the best answer, altho one might quibble with it slightly.

[Ig] Fiction European? YES

[rab] Eng. Lang.? OUI
[Ink] Comic? NO

[rab] Book? NO

[Ig] Shakespeare play? NO (not a play at all, in fact)
[Ink] Film? NO

[rab] Originating work of fiction a written form? NO

rater/rather

[Ink] Mineral part of the viewing medium? NO
[Raak] Painting? NO

[rab] Original work concrete? Almost not sure how to answer. Would, say, a CD or a score of a piece of music count as concrete and tangible for the purposes of the question (originating form is not a piece of music, btw)? If you'd say yes, then YES, if you'd say no, you meant something like a painting or a sculpture where the idea and its expression in concrete form are pretty much analogous, then NO. :) (© Overthinking Services Ltd)

[Raak] I think I'm in danger of leading you into a siding here. So that we can get back on the main track, let me reveal that the medium in question is TELEVISION (which can of course be put into the tangible form of videotape or DVD).

(Well, presumably before it was on television it was in a script, which is a concrete tangible form by any defition surely?)