SciFi? NO *a more contemplative mood steals over the audience, some smiling wryly but privately at this thought, others casting their eyes down and listening with a neutral expression*
[Darren] Title the name of a major character? *some of the audience look up. Two people bite their bottom lips.* NO.

[Darren] Eponymity? YES
[Quen] Published before 1930, YES
[ir] Male author? YES
[Ink] Written for children? *much laughter from the audience* NO.

[Darren] Er, I meant broad eponymity, rather than narrow, YES.

[Phil] Pr0nographic? YES *applause*

Quendalon must be right. I trust he/she has a pornograph.

[Quendalon] Indeed, YES!. Lady C and John Thomas it is.

---

[Projoy] What was the vegetable connection? Is there a notorious scene set in the kitchen garden, involving provocatively-shaped parsnips?

[Raak] Lady Chatterley's Lover is a novel, thus printed on paper.

(well, until recent digital innovations)

Incidentally, I'd never noticed before that the prosecution's "wife or servants" remark, although it certainly was out of touch, is a rhetorical way of activating the jealousy of rich husbands. Don't put ideas in their heads, it suggests, or you too may be cuckolded. Had always assumed before now it was just a general appeal to protect the weak-minded from moral corruption.

[Projoy] I was going to guess LC'sL, but the wry smiles at the Sci-fi question put me off...

[Phil] They were just the more imaginative members of the audience picturing the whole thing done in foil suits on a flying saucer.

---

For your pleasure: ABSTRACT