[irach] Human animal - Yes

[I] That's not a distinction I saw in my googling/dictionary checking, but it's an interesting idea. Mind you, at this point Superman certainly has multiple authors as well.
[GL] My bad: I think you're right. It is pretty clear at least that Superman is not an "obligate carnivore" (a term I just learned, meaning solely flesh-eating). And given that I also saw Superman eat a bomb in another episode, "omnivore" seems more appropriate. Googling seems to indicate, however, that the strict definition of these terms has to do with the necessity of different types of food in terms of nutrients. I actually have no idea if Superman has to eat anything.

[Rosie]British - Yes
[irach] Scientist - No

[ImNotJohn]Best known for cultural/artistic achievements - Yes

[Raak]Purcell - No

[Raak]Alive in the 20th century - Yes
[ImNotJohn] Musical connections - No

You didn't answer CdM's question about maleness

[CdM]Male - Yes
[Gusset Login] - An Actor - No

[Dandalf] A painter and/or sculptor - No
[Rosie]A writer - taking the narrowest definition No
[Raak]A mime - No

[Gusset Login] A performer of some sort - No

[Dandalf] To do with cinema - No

[Rosie] A poet - YES

[CdM]Siegfried Sassoon - No
[irach] T.S. Elliot - No
[Chalky] Rabbie Burns - No
[Phil]Ted Hughes - No

[Rosie]Philip Larkin - No
[CdM] Wilfred Owen - YES and Yes it was he, and so the chair is yours.

---

I think the audience was being a little harsh not to give my earlier Sassoon guess at least a smattering of applause. Anyway, this is ABSTRACT, with ANIMAL connections.