mc5 - AVMA Take 2

Yes, it's another round of that classic guessing game - Animal, Vegetable, Mineral, Abstract [or any combination thereof]. This effort - '03/'04 should address any queries, but then again, may just serve to confuse and baffle which some might say is the point of the game. Patience, integrity and a decent search engine may be useful ....

ImNotJohn

Shame

I can't help feeling we should have got closer to that. The 'state of mind' is what put me off the track for quite some time. I sympathise with Dandalf though as I also often find it difficult to look in more than a couple of times a day and once at weekends if I'm lucky.

Dandalf

Chalky - You are the strongest link.

Rosie

(Chalky) Strictly we ought to wait till Dandalf rubber-stamps it, even though you're obviously right. OK, I'll do one even thought I got nowhere near the answer.

Rosie

This one is ANIMAL

Non-human?

Non-alive?

non-edible?

Is it native to a particular country?

Rosie

irach - No
CdM - Yes
ImNotJohn - Probably not, now
Inkspot - Was (see answer to irach and CdM)

Rosie

Clarification - (INJ) Probably not edible, I meant.

rach

Non-fictional?

Raak

Male?

Rosie

rach - Yes
Raak - Yes

Inkspot

Is he European?

Irouléguy

Mozart?

Kim

Anything to do with either monkeys, typewriters or Shakespeare?

Phil

A broadcaster?

Rosie

Inkspot - Yes
Irouléguy - No
Kim - Not a thing
Phil - No

Chalky

Might I make a suggestion? This game went through a period [I think CdM started the trend and I'm sure you, Rosie, amongst others, followed the initiative] of putting the Yes/No replies next to, not just the name of the questioner, but also a C&P of the question. For those folks, like me at the moment, who can only rush in for a few moments, there isn't time to trawl back through the questions to match them to the replies .. so I end up not bothering to frame a question of my own. It may make for more participation ..