fur [Rosie] Another possibility relates to papal infallibility. The Pope could easily make a pronouncement through extraordinary Magisterium to the effect that the rule about celibacy in the priesthood does not apply to the Pontiff himself. Even if this contradicted previous teaching, such pronouncements are by definition never theologically or morally incorrect. He would then be free to father as many children as he wanted, at the risk of causing a schism in the church!
enormous [R/D] Of course, Popes have not always been 'celebate' or single, the early ones, up to the 11 century, were almost certainly married as society demanded in those days. And I am not RC either.
wouldn't [Rosie et al] Non-Roman (i.e. the Eastern varieties) Catholic priests may marry and father children, although I don't know if any of them may be addressed as "Your Holiness"
The(Juxtapose) The first said-to-be-manufactured group I know was The Monkees (ca 1960) with "I'm a believer". Quite a good tune, silly words, as ever.
[Rosie] Eunice Kennedy-Shriver is the sister of the late John F Kennedy and Arnold Schwartzenegger's mother-in-law. So the whole thing makes sense, you see?
The(Tuj, Softers) I had hoped that "runs" would be interpreted in the cricketing sense. "Wickets" would be less ambiguous but didn't we win the Test by a number of runs? Too bad. Let's start another.
wardrobe;[Knobbly] there is actually quite a gulf between what normal word proportions ought to dictate and what they do, in fact, dictate: the Alspunker Dictum of 1962 states quite clearly that the word "prestidigitation" ought to occur in a sentence, on average, at least once in every two hundred moves in any Cheddars game. We are currently running slightly below average.
isI think that the integrity of this sentence is just about salvageable, if we all recognise that the whole of the middle of it, from this word up to the word "imbecile" is a subordinate clause