Fun physics? No. Fun life? No, although humans have and have had a great interest in the AOTC. It's not an occupation, either. Earthbound? So far as anyone knows, only on Earth.
Observable? There are observations of this occurring. Economic? No. Aristotelian? Didn't know him personally, but the concept was almost certainly around then.
Biology? Arguments start among the audience. Life and death and so forth are all biological, but this is not usually considered to be a biological process. Rebirth? No, but the audience really like it. Appreciation is shown.
It's not metamorphosis, enlightenment is nice but completely off beam, "renaissance" is a good try but "the Renaissance" is totally wrong. The audience are collecting tomatoes to throw.
Not cryonics, not rejuvenation, but definitely Resurrection! (We started this around Easter, so it seemed appropriate.) Congratulations to CdM, who gets to take this stone baton and roll it away. Don't forget to like, subscribe, or leave a review.
Fixed location? Interesting question. If I wanted to be tricky, I'd give a straightforward and honest answer of No. But a more helpful answer is: Yes, when understood in the context of the AOTC.
Vegetable that resembles non-vegetable? Resemble is a tricky word. I’d say more No than Yes as the word is typically used, but—stretching the meaning of resemble to its broader senses—you could plausibly say Yes.
As a ps to my answer to Tuj, the absence of a fixed location in general is certainly useful information as well.
Is it alive? No. But be careful about your assumptions. Associated with a particular season? No. * a certain tension in the air intimates that the audience almost wants to applaud but knows it shouldn’t* Legible? No.
Connected to a celebration? *considerable audience laughter*. I think I have to say No, though some might argue the point. Relevant to archaeology? No. Vegetable part edible? Yes. (And remember the whole thing is vegetable, not just part of it.) Was it art? *more laughter* Not in the conventional sense, No.
After your good start I am surprised this is taking so long. As a hint, you could always explore the animal connection further.
Named after a person? Strictly speaking, No. But Yes would actually be a more helpful answer. “The” is not in third place. I said it wasn’t “The X of Y”. For free, I’ll tell you “The King Edward potato” exactly corresponds to the AOTC, though I’ll mention again that other descriptions would be perfectly acceptable. The King Edward potato? No. I’ll also remind you that the AOTC is unique “of”-inclusive? No.
Vegetable = vegetable? Yes. The Liz Truss lettuce? Yes! Have this unconventionally shaped baton. It’s slightly brown on the edges, but still perfectly usable.
Thank you, though this baton is somewhat rotten on the inside. No similarity to any person, living or half-dead, is to be inferred. So let's relaunch with MINERAL with some VEGETABLE connotations.