[SM] NO. If I'd set that and there wasn't a guess straight away, that could have taken years! [RTG] NO. Although, to be strictly honest, YES it can be linked. Hidden textThat feeling seems to me like something that might have been named by Liff, but it's possible my thoughts are being influenced by my main source of the feeling being my job QCing British geographic data!
[R] NO. Well, no more than your average abstract does. Or maybe slightly more. I need to ask a blind person! [CdM] NO. I *think* this one is inarguable!
If you were standing in front of Raak and Chalky, one of whom always tells the truth and the other of whom always lies, and both know the AOTC, and all of you know the foregoing but you do not know which one is the truth teller, and you were to ask Raak "if you asked Chalky if the AOTC begins with the letter P, is it the case that she wouldn't not say 'No'?", is it the case that he wouldn't not say yes?
[C] YES. Unless I've made a mistake! Are you? :P Hidden textIf I had chosen the AOTC to be something related to lying all the time, and gave the opposite answer to every question... that would have been very brave indeed! [SM] NO! Hidden textHonestly, NO!
[C] Interpreting that as asking whether this thing has always existed: YES. [B] NO. But the audience, who applauded the previous question, make appreciative noises.
[B] NO. [C1] YES is the useful answer. A strict and slightly tedious reading of your question could yield the answer NO. [C2] NO. (but good to know I got your logic question correct!) [R] YES, it seems, but probably not significantly for a very long time.
This AVMA seemed like an interesting idea when I thought of it, but in hindsight probably was a mistake. :) And my commitment to exemplifying the AOTC with my answers has left me unable to communicate any nuance in my responses. You are all being too specific; the AOTC is a general (and very simple concept) that is a feature of many of the guesses you have collectively made.