Connected to a celebration? *considerable audience laughter*. I think I have to say No, though some might argue the point. Relevant to archaeology? No. Vegetable part edible? Yes. (And remember the whole thing is vegetable, not just part of it.) Was it art? *more laughter* Not in the conventional sense, No.
After your good start I am surprised this is taking so long. As a hint, you could always explore the animal connection further.
Named after a person? Strictly speaking, No. But Yes would actually be a more helpful answer. “The” is not in third place. I said it wasn’t “The X of Y”. For free, I’ll tell you “The King Edward potato” exactly corresponds to the AOTC, though I’ll mention again that other descriptions would be perfectly acceptable. The King Edward potato? No. I’ll also remind you that the AOTC is unique “of”-inclusive? No.
Vegetable = vegetable? Yes. The Liz Truss lettuce? Yes! Have this unconventionally shaped baton. It’s slightly brown on the edges, but still perfectly usable.
Thank you, though this baton is somewhat rotten on the inside. No similarity to any person, living or half-dead, is to be inferred. So let's relaunch with MINERAL with some VEGETABLE connotations.