And, if Bismarck is declaring this a double round: Are you regretting your selection yet?

[B] Yes! Partly, it does represent an animal.
[B] No! It is not made of wood.
[T] It could be smaller or larger than a toaster.
[T] Not yet. Maybe if we're still on this by Christmas.

[SM] Not an heraldic device.

[T] Yes, associated with a particular nation.

[SM] Just one animal.

[RtG] Not the Great Seal.

[T] No statues.

[P] It does not make a sound.

[T] Yes, the original object was created in a known year.

[R] The animal is human.

[T] Not a flag or a crest.

To get past the awkwardness of the uniqueness thing, I retroactively declare that we are looking for the unambiguously unique, physical, original object, which indeed in part represents a human, was created in a known year, etc. Clue: not many people have seen the original, and I can find no information about whether it even still exists.