[CdM] A fair point. However, Ernie Murgle's tract: Semantic Correlates of Unaccusativity [1973] highlights the formal properties of such lexical derivations. 'Murgle' from the French 'murgler' has evolved into one of the few verbs that can have infinitive objects with agents or gerunds but with a difference in meaning which is left to the speaker/writer. Agree, though, that wibbly dialect can distort the shades of meaning.

(pen) Batteries OK - no spoofery detected. Are you sure yours don't need the recharger. :-)

---

Whenever you need to recharge [Rosie] If I didn't know you better I'd say you'd had a SOH bypass :-)

Ça vous fera d'avantage. (Chalky) Yeah, awright missis. :-)

---

If it's fun and adventure you seek, [Rosie]*coughcoughbadsyntaxcough*

You that fetishism's not rare. (nights) I'm not surprised. What should it be, then? I did get the country right. Next time; Welsh.

---

Lain down by the fire one night, (Rosie) I'd have gone for "ça vous sera d'avantage" myself. Irritatingly though, I can't satisfactorily tell you why.

'Twas wreathèd in vapours (nights) Not the syntax, then. Just one letter, in fact, but I bow to your greater knowledge.

All hopes of recovery truly sunk [Software] Crikey, you're right, but then I was never any good at the subjunctive.

---

I wouldn't normally do this, but given that this line doesn't really scan, seems unconnected to the previous lines (unless I'm missing something), and has apparently stalled the limerick, I suggest replacing it with
To Cannery Row