In the phamaceutical product naming stakes I thought it was difficult for anusol to be trumped (so to speak), but it appears to have been done.

And on the topic in hand [Dan] Can you remember which pub in Edinburgh that was?

[rab] Slightly odd thing just now. The site displayed without any CSS (just a bulleted list of games). A reload got it back as normal. I don't know if this was just a momentary glitch or something you'd want to know about.

If it happens again, look at the page source and see if the css is actually being loaded in the html (by a LINK tag).

[rab] Unfortunately not. I'm certain it was in Rose Street, or just off, but that's about it. It had a "locals only" vibe which we were too oblivious to pick up on at first.

[Rab]That stuff has been around for years! Which probably explains the name. Can you see a new product coming out with a name like that? At least you can't have any doubts about what it's for.

[snorgle] Although, oddly, its makers do, referring euphemistically to "feminine itching". That sounds to me like some sort of marital complaint.

[Dan] Oh well, it's probably been overhauled and turned into vertical drinking bar now. Not sure which I prefer really.

[feminine itch] What does this sentence mean: "Every woman shares in the dilemma of those nagging feminine problems."?

(Projoy) Quite. What dilemma? But I can't see much wrong with the product name. It's certainly not in the same league as Anusol. *(creases up)*

[Projoy] I don't care what the sentence means, but I loathe the use of those "those" words in advertising and journalism.

[Phil] You've got to admit, it would be worse with "them" instead.

[Darren] As a Geordie (originally), I think "them" would be much more fun.

Shouldn't it be 'they', to aim at the Glaswegian market?